Abstract
Background: Bereaved relatives are considered to be a vulnerable group and there is debate as to whether it is ethical to engage them in research at a time that can be difficult for them.
Aim: We conducted a cross-sectional study using cognitive interviewing with the aim of exploring the acceptability of a mortality follow-back survey among bereaved relatives of recently deceased cancer patients to inform the development of a large-scale survey about end-of-life care.
Results: Thirty-three next-of-kin of recently deceased cancer patients were invited to participate in a face-to-face interview, or to complete a postal questionnaire. At the end, they were asked about their views of engaging in the study. Nine bereaved relatives participated in a face-to-face interview and 11 completed the postal questionnaire. Eleven relatives reported it was helpful to take part in the study; of these, six did not consider it distressing, and five stated whilst it had been distressing it had been helpful. Thoughts about bringing back memories, altruism and therapeutic value emerged.
Conclusions: We have new evidence that although engaging in follow-back surveys can evoke distress, many participants report it to be a positive experience. We therefore believe that this approach is acceptable when conducted sensitively.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 379-383 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Palliative Medicine |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2012 |
Keywords
- LIFE
- PALLIATIVE CARE RESEARCH
- LAST 3 MONTHS
- METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES
- ILL PATIENTS
- cognitive interviewing
- EXPERIENCE
- FAMILY-MEMBERS
- ITALIAN SURVEY
- SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS
- DEATH
- survey
- Bereaved relatives
- cancer
