Between counting and multiplication: low-attaining students’ spatial structuring, enumeration and errors in concretely-presented 3D array tasks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)
272 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The move from additive thinking to multiplicative thinking requires significant change in children's comprehension and manipulation of number relationships. This change is not a single cognitive leap, but involves various different conceptual components, and can be a slow, multi-stage process for some learners. Unit arrays are a key visuospatial representation for teaching/learning about multiplicative relationships, but most research focuses on 2D (rectangular) arrays, and that which does address 3D (cuboid) arrays still frequently uses 2D representations of these. This paper documents low-attaining children’s partially-developed multiplicative thinking as they work on concretely-presented 3D array tasks; it also presents a framework for microanalysis of learners’ early multiplicative thinking in array tasks. Data derives from a small but cognitively diverse set of participants, arithmetically low-attaining for their ages, and relying heavily on counting-based strategies: this enabled detailed analysis of small but significant differences in their arithmetical engagement with the arrays. The analytical framework combines and builds on previous structural and enumerative categorizations, and is appropriate for use with a variety of array representations including but not limited to the blocks of unit cubes in the task sequence described here.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)95-114
JournalMathematical Thinking and Learning
Volume19
Issue number2
Early online date6 Apr 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2017

Keywords

  • numeracy
  • counting
  • arithmetical strategies
  • multiplicative thinking
  • low attainment
  • qualitative analysis
  • microgenetic methods

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Between counting and multiplication: low-attaining students’ spatial structuring, enumeration and errors in concretely-presented 3D array tasks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this