Biased interpretation in paranoia and its modification

George Savulich, Annabel Edwards, Sara Assadi, Husniye Guven, Emily Leathers-smith, Sukhi Shergill, Jenny Yiend

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
147 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background and objectives: Cognitive models of psychosis implicate interpretation biases as one of the mechanisms involved in the formation and maintenance of symptoms. First we measured the strength of association between interpretation biases and psychosis-relevant traits. Next we manipulated these biases and quantified the effects of doing so on psychosis-relevant outcomes. Methods: Experiment 1 used two measures of interpretation bias in a healthy sample (n = 70). Experiment 2 used a novel cognitive bias modification procedure (CMB-pa) in individuals with moderate trait paranoia (n = 60). Results: Experiment 1 revealed that over a third of the variance in interpretation bias could be explained by the combined effect of trait measures of paranoia/psychosis. In Experiment 2, CBM-pa produced training-congruent changes in the interpretation of new ambiguous information and influenced the interpretation, attribution and distress associated with a real-life social event. Limitations: The potentially confounding effects of elevated anxiety and depression on interpretation bias and the restricted range of outcome measures to assess the wider effects of CBM-pa. Conclusions: These studies are consistent with interpretation biases contributing to the maintenance of paranoia. CBM-pa could next be adapted and evaluated to test its efficacy as a therapeutic intervention.

Original languageEnglish
Article number101575
Pages (from-to)101575
JournalJournal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
Volume69
Early online date4 May 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2020

Keywords

  • Cognitive bias modification
  • Information processing
  • Interpretation bias
  • Paranoia

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Biased interpretation in paranoia and its modification'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this