King's College London

Research portal

Bidi smokers at increased risk of oral cancer.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Standard

Bidi smokers at increased risk of oral cancer. / Warnakulasuriya, S.

In: Evidence-Based Dentistry, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2005, p. 19 - .

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

Warnakulasuriya, S 2005, 'Bidi smokers at increased risk of oral cancer.', Evidence-Based Dentistry, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 19 - .. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6400297

APA

Warnakulasuriya, S. (2005). Bidi smokers at increased risk of oral cancer. Evidence-Based Dentistry, 6(1), 19 - .. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6400297

Vancouver

Warnakulasuriya S. Bidi smokers at increased risk of oral cancer. Evidence-Based Dentistry. 2005;6(1):19 - . https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6400297

Author

Warnakulasuriya, S. / Bidi smokers at increased risk of oral cancer. In: Evidence-Based Dentistry. 2005 ; Vol. 6, No. 1. pp. 19 - .

Bibtex Download

@article{38e7c5139be54423aa4cfc2e10e18f1a,
title = "Bidi smokers at increased risk of oral cancer.",
abstract = "DATA SOURCES: Source articles were searched for using Medline, the Cochrane Library and within the references lists of identified articles. STUDY SELECTION: Articles were selected that included data enabling construction of 2 x 2 tables to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: For each study, two-way contingency tables were constructed, based on exposure frequency distributions, for cases and controls. Unadjusted OR and 95% CI were recalculated based on the reported data using standard procedures. Separate contingency tables were made for bidi smoking, cigarette smoking and both types of smoking if the data were available in the same article. The overall OR combined across all studies, and its 95% CI, was calculated using a random-effects model for bidi and cigarette smoking. Tests for publication bias and heterogeneity were conducted. Confounding factors, for example, betel quid chewing or alcohol use, were not included in the meta-regression model. RESULTS: An increased risk of oral cancer was found for bidi smokers compared with people who had never smoked (OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 2.0-5.0) whereas no significant pattern of risk was found for cigarette smokers (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.7-1.8). There was substantial heterogeneity in the pooled OR estimate. CONCLUSIONS: The results clearly indicate that bidi smokers are at increased risk of oral cancer. It is important that this information be incorporated into smoking prevention and cessation efforts, particularly in the urban poor and rural mass in south Asian countries where bidi smoking is widespread.",
author = "S Warnakulasuriya",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1038/sj.ebd.6400297",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "19 -- .",
journal = "Evidence-Based Dentistry",
issn = "1462-0049",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "1",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bidi smokers at increased risk of oral cancer.

AU - Warnakulasuriya, S

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - DATA SOURCES: Source articles were searched for using Medline, the Cochrane Library and within the references lists of identified articles. STUDY SELECTION: Articles were selected that included data enabling construction of 2 x 2 tables to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: For each study, two-way contingency tables were constructed, based on exposure frequency distributions, for cases and controls. Unadjusted OR and 95% CI were recalculated based on the reported data using standard procedures. Separate contingency tables were made for bidi smoking, cigarette smoking and both types of smoking if the data were available in the same article. The overall OR combined across all studies, and its 95% CI, was calculated using a random-effects model for bidi and cigarette smoking. Tests for publication bias and heterogeneity were conducted. Confounding factors, for example, betel quid chewing or alcohol use, were not included in the meta-regression model. RESULTS: An increased risk of oral cancer was found for bidi smokers compared with people who had never smoked (OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 2.0-5.0) whereas no significant pattern of risk was found for cigarette smokers (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.7-1.8). There was substantial heterogeneity in the pooled OR estimate. CONCLUSIONS: The results clearly indicate that bidi smokers are at increased risk of oral cancer. It is important that this information be incorporated into smoking prevention and cessation efforts, particularly in the urban poor and rural mass in south Asian countries where bidi smoking is widespread.

AB - DATA SOURCES: Source articles were searched for using Medline, the Cochrane Library and within the references lists of identified articles. STUDY SELECTION: Articles were selected that included data enabling construction of 2 x 2 tables to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: For each study, two-way contingency tables were constructed, based on exposure frequency distributions, for cases and controls. Unadjusted OR and 95% CI were recalculated based on the reported data using standard procedures. Separate contingency tables were made for bidi smoking, cigarette smoking and both types of smoking if the data were available in the same article. The overall OR combined across all studies, and its 95% CI, was calculated using a random-effects model for bidi and cigarette smoking. Tests for publication bias and heterogeneity were conducted. Confounding factors, for example, betel quid chewing or alcohol use, were not included in the meta-regression model. RESULTS: An increased risk of oral cancer was found for bidi smokers compared with people who had never smoked (OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 2.0-5.0) whereas no significant pattern of risk was found for cigarette smokers (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.7-1.8). There was substantial heterogeneity in the pooled OR estimate. CONCLUSIONS: The results clearly indicate that bidi smokers are at increased risk of oral cancer. It is important that this information be incorporated into smoking prevention and cessation efforts, particularly in the urban poor and rural mass in south Asian countries where bidi smoking is widespread.

U2 - 10.1038/sj.ebd.6400297

DO - 10.1038/sj.ebd.6400297

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 19 - .

JO - Evidence-Based Dentistry

JF - Evidence-Based Dentistry

SN - 1462-0049

IS - 1

ER -

View graph of relations

© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454