Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
A. M. Holden, D. Sharma, C. Schilling, G. Gnanasegaran, E. W. Odell, I. Sassoon, M. McGurk
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 615-620 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Journal | British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery |
Volume | 56 |
Issue number | 7 |
Early online date | 15 Jul 2018 |
DOIs | |
Accepted/In press | 27 Jun 2018 |
E-pub ahead of print | 15 Jul 2018 |
Published | 1 Sep 2018 |
Additional links |
Biopsy of the sentinel_HOLDEN_Accepted27Jun2018_epub 13Jul2018GREEN AAM CCBYNCND
Biopsy_of_the_sentinel_HOLDEN_Accepted27June2018_GREEN_AAM_CC_BY_NC_ND_.pdf, 545 KB, application/pdf
Uploaded date:22 Oct 2018
Version:Accepted author manuscript
Licence:CC BY-NC-ND
UK national guidelines in 2016 recommended that sentinel lymph node biopsy should be offered to patients with early oral cancer (T1-T2 N0) in which the primary site can be reconstructed directly. This study describes the pitfalls that can be avoided in the technique of biopsy to improve outcomes. We retrospectively analysed the data from 100 consecutive patients and recorded any adverse events. Lymphatic drainage of tracer failed in two patients as a result of procedural errors. Two patients with invaded nodes developed recurrence after total neck dissection, one after micrometastases had been diagnosed, and the other as a result of extranodal spread that had led to understaging and therefore undertreatment. Two results would not have been mistakenly classified as clear if all the harvested nodes had been analysed histologically according to the protocol. The disease-specific (96%) and disease-free (92%) survival were better than expected for a group of whom a third had stage 3 disease. If all harvested nodes had been analysed by the correct protocol then two of the three nodes wrongly designated clear would have been detected, two deaths potentially avoided, and the false-negative rate would have fallen from 8.3% to 2.7%. We conclude that minor deviations from protocol can result in a detrimental outcome for the patient.
King's College London - Homepage
© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454