King's College London

Research portal

Blood pressure variability within a single visit and all-cause mortality

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

T. G. Papaioannou, G. Georgiopoulos, K. S. Stamatelopoulos, A. D. Protogerou, K. I. Alexandraki, A. Argyris, D. A. Vrachatis, D. Soulis, A. Papanikolaou, D. Manolesou, S. S. Daskalopoulou, D. Tousoulis

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)175-182
Number of pages8
JournalNetherlands Journal of Medicine
Volume78
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2020

King's Authors

Abstract

Background: Within-visit variability of repeated sequential readings of blood pressure (BP) is an important phenomenon that may affect precision of BP measurement and thus decision making concerning BP-related risk and hypertension management. However, limited data exist concerning predictive ability of within-visit BP variability for clinical outcomes. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the association between the variability of three repeated office BP measurements and the risk of all-cause mortality, independent of BP levels. Methods: Data collected through the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) were analysed. NHANES is a program of studies designed to assess health and nutritional status of adults and children in the United States. A complete set of three sequential BP measurements, together with survival status, were available for 24969 individuals (age 46.8±19.3 years, 49% males). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine the prognostic ability of the examined demographic, clinical, and haemodynamic indices. Results: Among various examined indices of variability of systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure measurements, the standard deviation of DBP (DBPSD ) was the stronger independent predictor of mortality (odds ratio 1.064, 95% Confidence Interval: 1.011-1.12) after adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, smoking, SBP, heart rate, history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolaemia, and cardiovascular events. Conclusion: Within-visit variability of three sequential office DBP readings may allow for the identification of high-risk patients better than mean SBP and DBP levels. The predictive value of within-visit BP variability and methods to improve its clinical application are worthy of further research.

View graph of relations

© 2018 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454