Bone marrow versus peripheral blood as the stem cell source for sibling transplants in acquired aplastic anemia: survival advantage for bone marrow in all age groups

Andrea Bacigalupo*, Gerard Socie, Hubert Schrezenmeier, Andre Tichelli, Anna Locasciulli, Monika Fuehrer, Antonio M. Risitano, Carlo Dufour, Jakob R. Passweg, Rosi Oneto, Mahmoud Aljurf, Catherine Flynn, Valerie Mialou, Rose Marie Hamladji, Judith Marsh, European Grp Blood Marrow Transpla

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    188 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Background: Bone marrow has been shown to be superior to peripheral blood, as a stem cell source, in young patients (<20 years of age) with acquired aplastic anemia undergoing a matched sibling transplant. The aim of this study was to test whether this currently also holds true for older patients with acquired aplastic anemia. Design and Methods: We analyzed 1886 patients with acquired aplastic anemia who received a first transplant from a human leukocyte antigen identical sibling between 1999 and 2009, with either bone marrow (n=1163) or peripheral blood (n=723) as the source of stem cells. Results: In multivariate Cox analysis negative predictors for survival were: patient’s age over 20 years (RR 2.0, P<0.0001), an interval between diagnosis and transplantation of more than 114 days (RR 1.3, P=0.006), no anti-thymocyte globulin in the conditioning (RR 1.6, P=0.0001), a conditioning regimen other than cyclophosphamide (RR=1.3, P=0.008) and the use of peripheral blood as the source of stem cells (RR 1.6,P<0.00001). The survival advantage for recipients of bone marrow rather than peripheral blood was statistically significant in patients aged 1–19 years (90% versus76% P<0.00001) as well as in patients aged over 20 years (74% versus 64%,P=0.001). The advantage for recipients of bone marrow over peripheral blood was maintained above the age of 50 years (69% versus 39%, P=0.01). Acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease were more frequent in peripheral blood transplants. Major causes of death were graft-versus-host disease (2% versus 6% in bone marrow and peripheral blood recipients, respectively), infections (6% versus 13%), and graft rejection (1.5% versus 2.5%). Conclusions: This study shows that bone marrow should be the preferred stem cell source for matched sibling transplants in acquired aplastic anemia, in patients of all age groups.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1142-1148
    Number of pages7
    JournalHaematologica
    Volume97
    Issue number8
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Aug 2012

    Keywords

    • aplastic anemia
    • allogeneic transplantation
    • bone marrow transplants
    • peripheral blood transplants
    • VERSUS-HOST-DISEASE
    • ANTITHYMOCYTE GLOBULIN
    • UNRELATED DONORS
    • OUTCOMES
    • PROPHYLAXIS
    • FLUDARABINE
    • REGIMEN
    • TRIAL

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Bone marrow versus peripheral blood as the stem cell source for sibling transplants in acquired aplastic anemia: survival advantage for bone marrow in all age groups'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this