Brain talk: power and negotiation in children's discourse about self, brain and behaviour

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

62 Citations (Scopus)


This article examines children's discourse about self, brain and behaviour, focusing on the dynamics of power, knowledge and responsibility articulated by children. The empirical data discussed in this article are drawn from the study of Voices on Identity, Childhood, Ethics and Stimulants, which included interviews with 151 US and UK children, a subset of whom had a diagnosis of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Despite their contact with psychiatric explanations and psychotropic drugs for their behaviour, children's discursive engagements with the brain show significant evidence of agency and negotiated responsibility. These engagements suggest the limitations of current concepts that describe a collapse of the self into the brain in an age of neurocentrism. Empirical investigation is needed in order to develop agent-centred conceptual and theoretical frameworks that describe and evaluate the harms and benefits of treating children with psychotropic drugs and other brain-based technologies.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbern/a
Pages (from-to)813-827
Number of pages15
JournalSociology of Health and Illness
Issue number6
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - Jul 2013


Dive into the research topics of 'Brain talk: power and negotiation in children's discourse about self, brain and behaviour'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this