Breaking down power distance into 5 dimensions

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Prior research has frequently used an employee's power distance orientation to explain differences in leadership effectiveness, work attitudes, consumer attitudes, and job performance. However, researchers have reported low reliabilities of power distance scales. One reason for these low reliabilities might be the application of country-level power distance scales to the individual level of analysis. Another reason might be the existence of different measurement scales that capture important but not all aspects of power distance. To expand power distance research, we propose a construct mixology approach and introduce a new fine-grained conceptualization of power distance at the individual level of analysis, which we call psychological power distance. Psychological power distance is based on five sub-dimensions: 1) Power, 2) conflict with authority figure, 3) hierarchy, 4) prestige, and 5) social distance. To validate this new conceptualization, we conducted a survey study with 8423 people from 28 countries. The results support the five-dimensional conceptualization of psychological power distance among employees from different countries.

Original languageEnglish
Article number112178
JournalPersonality and Individual Differences
Volume208
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2023

Keywords

  • Conflict
  • Culture-inspired personal values
  • Hierarchy
  • Individual differences
  • Prestige
  • Psychological power distance
  • Status

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Breaking down power distance into 5 dimensions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this