Can the Two Positions be Reconciled?

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

The Afterword seeks to reconcile the two seemingly incompatible claims of the book: first, the claim that assessment threatens to damage the education of children, to the extent that it serves its intended purpose of allowing comparisons to be made between schools; second, the claim that meaningful assessment is an indispensable part of the process of education. Lum begins by questioning the plausibility of the ‘interconnected knowledge thesis’, arguing that the distinction that is more substantively at issue relates not to knowledge but to the stance an assessor is required to take towards the evidence of knowledge and that there is a choice between two fundamentally different approaches: what he refers to as ‘prescriptive’ and ‘expansive’ modes of assessment. He argues that whilst both approaches play a vital role in teaching and learning, neither, for different reasons, can feasibly be used for the high-stakes assessment of schools and teachers.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationEducational Assessment on Trial
EditorsAndrew Davis, Christopher Winch
Place of PublicationLondon
PublisherBloomsbury Academic
Pages107-131
Number of pages24
Edition1
ISBN (Electronic)9781472572318, 9781472572301
ISBN (Print)9781472572295
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Publication series

NameKey Debates in Educational Policy
PublisherBloomsbury

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Can the Two Positions be Reconciled?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this