@inbook{2ab02e9f6c1440ae923c53768492f663,
title = "Can the Two Positions be Reconciled?",
abstract = "The Afterword seeks to reconcile the two seemingly incompatible claims of the book: first, the claim that assessment threatens to damage the education of children, to the extent that it serves its intended purpose of allowing comparisons to be made between schools; second, the claim that meaningful assessment is an indispensable part of the process of education. Lum begins by questioning the plausibility of the {\textquoteleft}interconnected knowledge thesis{\textquoteright}, arguing that the distinction that is more substantively at issue relates not to knowledge but to the stance an assessor is required to take towards the evidence of knowledge and that there is a choice between two fundamentally different approaches: what he refers to as {\textquoteleft}prescriptive{\textquoteright} and {\textquoteleft}expansive{\textquoteright} modes of assessment. He argues that whilst both approaches play a vital role in teaching and learning, neither, for different reasons, can feasibly be used for the high-stakes assessment of schools and teachers.",
author = "Gerard Lum",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781472572295",
series = "Key Debates in Educational Policy",
publisher = "Bloomsbury Academic",
pages = "107--131",
editor = "Davis, {Andrew } and Christopher Winch",
booktitle = "Educational Assessment on Trial",
edition = "1",
}