King's College London

Research portal

Causes of subcutaneous emphysema following dental procedures: a systematic review of cases 1993-2020

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Adam Jones, Sami Stagnell, Tara Renton, Vishal R. Aggarwal, Richard Moore

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)493-500
Number of pages8
JournalBritish Dental Journal
Volume231
Issue number8
DOIs
PublishedOct 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information: Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Ikeda reported receiving grant support from Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma and lecture fees from Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis Pharma, AbbVie GK, and Eli Lilly. Dr Nakajima reported receiving grant support from Chugai Pharma (Roche Group), Bristol Myers Squibb, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, and Astellas Pharma. No other disclosures were reported. Publisher Copyright: © 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to the British Dental Association.

King's Authors

Abstract

Objectives Causes of subcutaneous emphysema (SE) following dental treatment have changed with new operative techniques and equipment. This review demonstrates the frequency and aetiology of SE to inform prevention strategies for reducing SE occurrences. Methods A systematic search of Medline, Embase and PubMed databases identified 135 cases of SE which met inclusion criteria after independent review by two authors. Trends in frequency and causes of SE were displayed graphically and significant differences in frequency of SE by time period, site and hospital stay were analysed using t-tests. Results Dental extractions often preceded development of SE (54% of cases), commonly surgical extractions. Treatment of posterior mandibular teeth most often resulted in development of SE. Most cases were iatrogenic, with 51% resulting from an air-driven handpiece and 9% from air syringes. Factors such as nose blowing accounted for 10%. There was a significant (p <0.05) increase in cases over time. Mandibular teeth had increased hospital stay time compared to maxillary teeth (p <0.01). Conclusion Increased risks of SE were identified following use of air-driven handpieces during dental extractions and when treating lower molar teeth. Use of air-driven handpieces should be avoided during dental extractions to reduce risks and subsequent morbidity that results from SE.

View graph of relations

© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454