Cervical cancer incidence after normal cytological sample in routine screening using SurePath, ThinPrep, and conventional cytology: population based study

Kirsten Rozemeijer, Steffie K. Naber, Corine Penning, Lucy I. H. Overbeek, Caspar W. N. Looman, Inge M. C. M. de Kok, Suzette M. Matthijsse, Matejka Rebolj, Folkert J. van Kemenade, Marjolein van Ballegooijen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Citations (Scopus)
70 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective To compare the cumulative incidence of cervical cancer diagnosed within 72 months after a normal screening sample between conventional cytology and liquid based cytology tests SurePath and ThinPrep.

Design Retrospective population based cohort study.

Setting Nationwide network and registry of histo- and cytopathology in the Netherlands (PALGA), January 2000 to March 2013.

Population Women with 5 924 474 normal screening samples (23 833 123 person years).

Exposure Use of SurePath or ThinPrep versus conventional cytology as screening test.

Main outcome measure 72 month cumulative incidence of invasive cervical cancer after a normal screening sample for each screening test. Cox regression analyses assessed the hazard ratios, adjusted for calendar time, age, screening history, and socioeconomic status and including laboratories as random effects.

Results The 72 month cumulative cancer incidence was 58.5 (95% confidence interval 54.6 to 62.7) per 100 000 normal conventional cytology samples, compared with 66.8 (56.7 to 78.7) for ThinPrep and 44.6 (37.8 to 52.6) for SurePath. Compared with conventional cytology, the hazard of invasive cancer was 19% lower (hazard ratio 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.66 to 0.99) for SurePath, mainly caused by a 27% lower hazard (0.73, 0.57 to 0.93) of a clinically detected cancer. For ThinPrep, the hazard was on average 15% higher (hazard ratio 1.15, 0.95 to 1.38), mainly caused by a 56% higher hazard of a screen detected cancer (1.56, 1.17 to 2.08).

Conclusions These findings should provoke reconsideration of the assumed similarity in sensitivity to detect progressive cervical intraepithelial neoplasia between different types of liquid based cytology and conventional cytology.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberj504
Number of pages9
JournalBMJ (Clinical research ed.)
Volume356
Issue number0
Early online date14 Feb 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Feb 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cervical cancer incidence after normal cytological sample in routine screening using SurePath, ThinPrep, and conventional cytology: population based study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this