King's College London

Research portal

Cervical pessary placement for prevention of preterm birth in unselected twin pregnancies: a randomized controlled trial

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kypros Herodotou Nicolaides, Argyro Syngelaki, Chiu Yee Liona Poon, Catalina De Paco, Walter Plasencia, Francisca Molina, Gemma Picciarelli, Natasha Tul, Ebru Celik, TK Lau, Roberto Conturso

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume214
Issue number1
Early online date28 Aug 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2016

King's Authors

Abstract

Objective Preterm birth is the leading cause of neonatal death and handicap in survivors. Although twins are found in 1.5% of pregnancies they account for about 25% of preterm births. Randomized controlled trials in singleton pregnancies reported that the prophylactic use of progestogens, cervical cerclage, and cervical pessary reduce significantly the rate of early preterm birth. In twin pregnancies, progestogens and cervical cerclage have been shown to be ineffective in reducing preterm birth. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that the insertion of a cervical pessary in twin pregnancies would reduce the rate of spontaneous early preterm birth. Study Design This was a multicenter, randomized controlled trial in unselected twin pregnancies of cervical pessary placement from 20+0-24+6 weeks’ gestation until elective removal or delivery vs expectant management. Primary outcome was spontaneous birth <34 weeks. Secondary outcomes included perinatal death and a composite of adverse neonatal outcomes (intraventricular hemorrhage, respiratory distress syndrome, retinopathy of prematurity, or necrotizing enterocolitis) or need for neonatal therapy (ventilation, phototherapy, treatment for proven or suspected sepsis, or blood transfusion). Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered in the ISRCTN registry, number 01096902. Results A total of 1180 (56.0%) of the 2107 eligible women agreed to take part in the trial; 590 received cervical pessary and 590 had expectant management. Two of the former and 1 of the latter were lost to follow-up. There were no significant differences between the pessary and control groups in rates of spontaneous birth <34 weeks (13.6% vs 12.9%; relative risk [RR], 1.054; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.787–1.413; P = .722), perinatal death (2.5% vs 2.7%; RR, 0.908; 95% CI, 0.553–1.491; P = .702), adverse neonatal outcome (10.0 vs 9.2%; RR, 1.094; 95% CI, 0.851–1.407; P = .524), or neonatal therapy (17.9% vs 17.2%; RR, 1.040; 95% CI, 0.871–1.242; P = .701). A post hoc subgroup analysis of 214 women with short cervix (≤25 mm) showed no benefit from the insertion of a cervical pessary. Conclusion In women with twin pregnancy, routine treatment with cervical pessary does not reduce the rate of spontaneous early preterm birth.

View graph of relations

© 2018 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454