King's College London

Research portal

Cervical screening during the COVID-19 pandemic: optimising recovery strategies

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Alejandra Castanon, Matejka Rebolj, Emily Annika Burger, Inge M C M de Kok, Megan A Smith, Sharon J B Hanley, Francesca Maria Carozzi, Stuart Peacock, James F O'Mahony

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e522-e527
JournalThe Lancet Public Health
Volume6
Issue number7
Early online date30 Apr 2021
DOIs
E-pub ahead of print30 Apr 2021
PublishedJul 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information: This work was done on behalf of the Screening Working Group of the COVID-19 and Cancer Global Modelling Consortium (CCGMC) and we acknowledge all members of the CCGMC Steering Committee, Secretariat, and Working Group 2. This work was supported by Ireland's Health Research Board (grant number EIA-2017?054 to JFOM), the National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia; grant APP1159491 to MAS), Cancer Research UK (grant number C8162/A27047 to MR and AC), Cancer Institute NSW (ECF181561 to MAS), National Institutes of Health (USA; U01CA199334 to EAB), Norwegian Cancer Society (#198073 to EAB), and the National Cancer Centre (Japan; 31-A-20 to SJBH). These funders had no role in directing or the writing of the manuscript, or the decision to submit for publication. Funding Information: This work was done on behalf of the Screening Working Group of the COVID-19 and Cancer Global Modelling Consortium (CCGMC) and we acknowledge all members of the CCGMC Steering Committee, Secretariat, and Working Group 2. This work was supported by Ireland's Health Research Board ( grant number EIA-2017–054 to JFOM), the National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia; grant APP1159491 to MAS), Cancer Research UK (grant number C8162/A27047 to MR and AC), Cancer Institute NSW (ECF181561 to MAS), National Institutes of Health (USA; U01CA199334 to EAB), Norwegian Cancer Society (#198073 to EAB), and the National Cancer Centre (Japan; 31-A-20 to SJBH). These funders had no role in directing or the writing of the manuscript, or the decision to submit for publication. Funding Information: MR reports funding from Hologic and grants from Public Health England, outside of the submitted work. MAS reports grants from the National Health and Medical Research Council and the Cancer Institute New South Wales. SJBH reports grants from National Cancer Centre Japan. SP reports being a member of the Board of Directors for the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. All other authors declare no competing interests. Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license Copyright: Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

King's Authors

Abstract

Disruptions to cancer screening services have been experienced in most settings as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic. Ideally, programmes would resolve backlogs by temporarily expanding capacity; however, in practice, this is often not possible. We aim to inform the deliberations of decision makers in high-income settings regarding their cervical cancer screening policy response. We caution against performance measures that rely solely on restoring testing volumes to pre-pandemic levels because they will be less effective at mitigating excess cancer diagnoses than will targeted measures. These measures might exacerbate pre-existing inequalities in accessing cervical screening by disregarding the risk profile of the individuals attending. Modelling of cervical screening outcomes before and during the pandemic supports risk-based strategies as the most effective way for screening services to recover. The degree to which screening is organised will determine the feasibility of deploying some risk-based strategies, but implementation of age-based risk stratification should be universally feasible.

View graph of relations

© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454