Abstract
The ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka is a good example of how peace negotiations in civil war situations can be elusive. Although several factors impinge on the outcome of negotiations, from the experience of negotiating peace in Sri Lanka three prominent and recurrent variables come to the fore. These are: first, the competing nationalisms in the state-building project of Sri Lanka; second, the political outbidding practiced by the two major Sinhalese parties; and third, the authoritarian character of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), which thrives on a rationale of war and terror. These variables have informed spoiler behavior and foiled attempts at a decisive settlement of the ethnic conflict. As a result the ceasefire of 2002 at present lies in a shambles. While the failure of current negotiations does not rule out the likelihood of a future negotiated settlement, a significant reorientation in the country's political culture and mainstreaming of neglected voices and stakeholders alone would make negotiations successful. "Ethno-political conflicts are fought not just about resources or power, but about protecting group status, culture and identity. Identity and belief are non-negotiable, (yet) the means by which they are protected can be and have been the subject of creative compromises."
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 576 |
| Number of pages | 598 |
| Journal | Strategic Analysis |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Publication status | Published - 2006 |
