Chelsea, Pimlico and Belgravia District Nursing Association 1930-1939: A case study

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference paperpeer-review


The case study explores how the expansion of the health services during the interwar period impacted upon the status of district nursing and examines how being a voluntary service shaped district nursing associations. A range of primary sources were used; the Association Annual Reports, the Medical Officer for Health Annual Reports for the Borough of Chelsea, the Ministry of Health records, the archives of the Queen’s Nursing Institute (QNI) and the Borough of Chelsea Council Minutes.
The Medical Officer for Health Reports and the Council minutes identify efforts to improve environmental factors which impacted upon health. These primary sources briefly note the contribution of the Association suggesting that it was integral to the healthcare provision but considered a constant. The impact of changes to the 1932 Sunday Entertainments Act provide an interesting juxtaposition between the acknowledged value of district nursing and the constant struggle to fund raise in order to provide home nursing.
Throughout the 1930s the Association experienced staff shortages and challenges regarding recruitment. The complexities of payment for municipal health services following the 1929 Local Government Act contributed to the staffing challenges. The move to a block grant in 1938 provided increased stability with regards to income.
The case study identifies a contradiction regarding the esteem and value placed upon district nursing associations providing home nursing and the constant challenge of resources. District nursing services face similar challenges in this the 130th anniversary of the Queen’s Nursing Institute.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationUnited Kingdom Assocaition History of Nursing Colloquium 2017
Publication statusPublished - 2017


Dive into the research topics of 'Chelsea, Pimlico and Belgravia District Nursing Association 1930-1939: A case study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this