King's College London

Research portal

Children in foster care with symptoms of reactive attachment disorder: Feasibility randomised controlled trial of a modified video-feedback parenting intervention

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Paula Oliveira, Lydia Barge, Eloise Stevens, Sarah Byford, James Shearer, Ruan Spies, Julie Comyn, Kirsty Langley, Paul Ramchandani, Barry Wright, Matthew Woolgar, Eilis Kennedy, Stephen Scott, Jane Barlow, Danya Glaser, Rob Senior, Peter Fonagy, Pasco Fearon

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere134
JournalBJPsych Open
Volume8
Issue number4
DOIs
Accepted/In press16 Jun 2022
Published18 Jul 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information: This study is funded by the Health Technology Assessment programme of the National Institute for Health Research (reference 15/118/01). Publisher Copyright: Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists.

Documents

King's Authors

Abstract

Background
Looked-after children are at risk of suboptimal attachment patterns and reactive attachment disorder (RAD). However, access to interventions varies widely, and there are no evidence-based interventions for RAD.

Aims
To modify an existing parenting intervention for children with RAD in the UK foster care setting, and test the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of the modified intervention.

Method
The intervention was modified with expert input and tested on a case series. A feasibility and pilot RCT compared the new intervention with usual care. Foster carers and children in their care aged ≤6 years were recruited across nine local authorities, with 1:1 allocation and blind post-treatment assessments. The modified intervention was delivered in-home by trained mental health professionals over 4–6 months. Children were assessed for RAD symptoms, attachment quality and emotional/behavioural difficulties, and foster carers were assessed for sensitivity and stress.

Results
Minimal changes to the intervention programme were necessary, and focused on improving its suitability for the UK foster care context. Recruitment was challenging, and remained below target despite modifications to the protocol and the inclusion of additional sites. Thirty families were recruited to the RCT; 15 were allocated to each group. Most other feasibility outcomes were favourable, particularly high numbers of data and treatment completeness. The revised intervention was positively received by practitioners and foster carers.

Conclusions
A large-scale trial may be feasible, but only if recruitment barriers can be overcome. Dedicated resources to support recruitment within local authorities and wider inclusion criteria are recommended.

View graph of relations

© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454