King's College London

Research portal

Children's reasoning about peer and school segregation in a diverse society

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harriet R. Tenenbaum, Patrick Leman, Ana Aznar

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Community and Applied Social Psychology
Early online date16 May 2017
StateE-pub ahead of print - 16 May 2017

King's Authors


This study examined children's reasoning about gender- and religion-based exclusion in the context of single-gender and single-faith schools and play contexts. Young people (twenty-three 8- to 10-year-olds and fifty-three 12- to 14-year-olds) were asked to judge and reason about the acceptability of exclusion based on gender and religion by children and school principals. Participants rated exclusion based on gender as more acceptable than exclusion based on religion. Exclusion from school contexts was rated as more acceptable than exclusion from play contexts. Participants tended to invoke moral reasons to condemn exclusion when reasoning about religion, whereas they tended to invoke social conventional reasons when reasoning about gender. Young people's greater support for religiously inclusive schooling compared to gender inclusive schooling suggests that societal and governmental acceptance of religious diversity has support from future generations.

View graph of relations

© 2018 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454