Children's social representations in dolls' house play and theory of mind tasks, and their relation to family adversity and child disturbance

Lynne Murray*, Matthew Woolgar, Stephen Briers, Alison Hipwell

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    68 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Five-year-old children of depressed and well mothers were assessed on theory of mind tasks, and enacted scenes from their family lives in dolls' house play. Performance on theory of mind tasks was only weakly related to family circumstances and child disturbance, but was significantly associated with measures of the child's general and verbal intelligence. In contrast, children's social representations elicited during dolls' house play showed systematic relationships with family adversity (maternal depression and parental conflict) in interaction with the child's gender: girls exposed to difficulties depicted particularly harmonious mother-child relationships, and their accounts showed a high degree of narrative structure; while boys so exposed depicted poor parenting, and their accounts were relatively incoherent. The children's dolls' house play was also associated with several aspects of their wider experience, including objective assessments of mother-child interactions, and behavioural and emotional adjustment in school. This technique may usefully elucidate the basis of child behavioural problems and psychopathology in the context of disturbed family relationships, and provide a route for therapeutic intervention.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)178-200
    Number of pages23
    JournalSocial Development
    Volume8
    Issue number2
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 1999

    Keywords

    • Behaviour problems
    • Doll play
    • Postnatal depression
    • Theory of mind

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Children's social representations in dolls' house play and theory of mind tasks, and their relation to family adversity and child disturbance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this