King's College London

Research portal

China and Northeast Asia’s Regional Security Architecture: The Six-Party Talks as a Case of Chinese Regime-building?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard

China and Northeast Asia’s Regional Security Architecture : The Six-Party Talks as a Case of Chinese Regime-building? / Pacheco Pardo, Ramon.

In: East Asia, Vol. 29, No. 4, 12.2012, p. 337-354.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

Pacheco Pardo, R 2012, 'China and Northeast Asia’s Regional Security Architecture: The Six-Party Talks as a Case of Chinese Regime-building?', East Asia, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 337-354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-012-9181-4

APA

Pacheco Pardo, R. (2012). China and Northeast Asia’s Regional Security Architecture: The Six-Party Talks as a Case of Chinese Regime-building? East Asia, 29(4), 337-354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-012-9181-4

Vancouver

Pacheco Pardo R. China and Northeast Asia’s Regional Security Architecture: The Six-Party Talks as a Case of Chinese Regime-building? East Asia. 2012 Dec;29(4):337-354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-012-9181-4

Author

Pacheco Pardo, Ramon. / China and Northeast Asia’s Regional Security Architecture : The Six-Party Talks as a Case of Chinese Regime-building?. In: East Asia. 2012 ; Vol. 29, No. 4. pp. 337-354.

Bibtex Download

@article{97d92933442f4abbb6831d2115cf0077,
title = "China and Northeast Asia{\textquoteright}s Regional Security Architecture: The Six-Party Talks as a Case of Chinese Regime-building?",
abstract = "China, as host of the six-party talks first convened in August 2003, has been one of the major players in dealing with the North Korean nuclear crisis that began in October 2002. China{\textquoteright}s role in the talks has helped to start shaping a stable regional security architecture in Northeast Asia. Beijing{\textquoteright}s leadership in building a new security regime in the region suggests a change on Chinese perspectives regarding its role within the broader East Asia{\textquoteright}s regional security architecture. After years of passiveness with regards to involvement in security regime building in the region, China has evolved into an active leader seeking to shape a more institutionalized security. Despite the obstacles to building a functioning regime in Northeast Asia, China seems poised to continue working towards creation of a more stable and institutionalized security architecture.",
author = "{Pacheco Pardo}, Ramon",
year = "2012",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1007/s12140-012-9181-4",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "337--354",
journal = "East Asia",
issn = "1096-6838",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "4",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - China and Northeast Asia’s Regional Security Architecture

T2 - The Six-Party Talks as a Case of Chinese Regime-building?

AU - Pacheco Pardo, Ramon

PY - 2012/12

Y1 - 2012/12

N2 - China, as host of the six-party talks first convened in August 2003, has been one of the major players in dealing with the North Korean nuclear crisis that began in October 2002. China’s role in the talks has helped to start shaping a stable regional security architecture in Northeast Asia. Beijing’s leadership in building a new security regime in the region suggests a change on Chinese perspectives regarding its role within the broader East Asia’s regional security architecture. After years of passiveness with regards to involvement in security regime building in the region, China has evolved into an active leader seeking to shape a more institutionalized security. Despite the obstacles to building a functioning regime in Northeast Asia, China seems poised to continue working towards creation of a more stable and institutionalized security architecture.

AB - China, as host of the six-party talks first convened in August 2003, has been one of the major players in dealing with the North Korean nuclear crisis that began in October 2002. China’s role in the talks has helped to start shaping a stable regional security architecture in Northeast Asia. Beijing’s leadership in building a new security regime in the region suggests a change on Chinese perspectives regarding its role within the broader East Asia’s regional security architecture. After years of passiveness with regards to involvement in security regime building in the region, China has evolved into an active leader seeking to shape a more institutionalized security. Despite the obstacles to building a functioning regime in Northeast Asia, China seems poised to continue working towards creation of a more stable and institutionalized security architecture.

U2 - 10.1007/s12140-012-9181-4

DO - 10.1007/s12140-012-9181-4

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 337

EP - 354

JO - East Asia

JF - East Asia

SN - 1096-6838

IS - 4

ER -

View graph of relations

© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454