King's College London

Research portal

Choice, control and person-centredness in day centres for older people

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Standard

Choice, control and person-centredness in day centres for older people. / Orellana, Katharine; Manthorpe, Jill; Tinker, Anthea.

In: Journal of Social Work, 30.08.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

Orellana, K, Manthorpe, J & Tinker, A 2020, 'Choice, control and person-centredness in day centres for older people', Journal of Social Work. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017320952255

APA

Orellana, K., Manthorpe, J., & Tinker, A. (2020). Choice, control and person-centredness in day centres for older people. Journal of Social Work. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017320952255

Vancouver

Orellana K, Manthorpe J, Tinker A. Choice, control and person-centredness in day centres for older people. Journal of Social Work. 2020 Aug 30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017320952255

Author

Orellana, Katharine ; Manthorpe, Jill ; Tinker, Anthea. / Choice, control and person-centredness in day centres for older people. In: Journal of Social Work. 2020.

Bibtex Download

@article{1dc66830c3634fd3b0712ce9f5d8579b,
title = "Choice, control and person-centredness in day centres for older people",
abstract = "Background: Day centres are a substantial element of community-based support for older people in many countries. However, assumptions that they are an outdated or costly service model have resulted in many centre closures in England. The perspectives of 42 people attending, providing, making referrals to or purchasing places at four diverse day centres for older people were collected in interviews. Using these data, we explore day centres{\textquoteright} relevance to social workers{\textquoteright} efforts to promote person-centred support for older people enabling them to maintain or improve their well-being. These are explored from the perspectives of choice, control and person-centredness and local authority responsibilities for shaping the care market under the Care Act 2014. Findings: Attenders highly valued centres{\textquoteright} congregate nature and the continuity they offered which contributed to the development of person-centred relationships. Attenders exercised choice in attending day centres. Social work staff were more positive about day centres{\textquoteright} relevance to personalisation than those responsible for making decisions about the shape of local care services. Applications: With social isolation recognised as a serious risk of old age, the value of togetherness in group environments may need highlighting. Enactment of personalisation policies need not necessarily lead to individualisation; day centres may be community-based assets for some. Those shaping the care market may be encouraged to acknowledge wider outcomes, and frontline social workers may benefit from hearing positive experiences that may help in the development of effective care plans for older people who would like to benefit from day centre participation.",
keywords = "Social work, community care, older people, personalisation, qualitative research",
author = "Katharine Orellana and Jill Manthorpe and Anthea Tinker",
year = "2020",
month = aug,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1177/1468017320952255",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Social Work",
issn = "1468-0173",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Choice, control and person-centredness in day centres for older people

AU - Orellana, Katharine

AU - Manthorpe, Jill

AU - Tinker, Anthea

PY - 2020/8/30

Y1 - 2020/8/30

N2 - Background: Day centres are a substantial element of community-based support for older people in many countries. However, assumptions that they are an outdated or costly service model have resulted in many centre closures in England. The perspectives of 42 people attending, providing, making referrals to or purchasing places at four diverse day centres for older people were collected in interviews. Using these data, we explore day centres’ relevance to social workers’ efforts to promote person-centred support for older people enabling them to maintain or improve their well-being. These are explored from the perspectives of choice, control and person-centredness and local authority responsibilities for shaping the care market under the Care Act 2014. Findings: Attenders highly valued centres’ congregate nature and the continuity they offered which contributed to the development of person-centred relationships. Attenders exercised choice in attending day centres. Social work staff were more positive about day centres’ relevance to personalisation than those responsible for making decisions about the shape of local care services. Applications: With social isolation recognised as a serious risk of old age, the value of togetherness in group environments may need highlighting. Enactment of personalisation policies need not necessarily lead to individualisation; day centres may be community-based assets for some. Those shaping the care market may be encouraged to acknowledge wider outcomes, and frontline social workers may benefit from hearing positive experiences that may help in the development of effective care plans for older people who would like to benefit from day centre participation.

AB - Background: Day centres are a substantial element of community-based support for older people in many countries. However, assumptions that they are an outdated or costly service model have resulted in many centre closures in England. The perspectives of 42 people attending, providing, making referrals to or purchasing places at four diverse day centres for older people were collected in interviews. Using these data, we explore day centres’ relevance to social workers’ efforts to promote person-centred support for older people enabling them to maintain or improve their well-being. These are explored from the perspectives of choice, control and person-centredness and local authority responsibilities for shaping the care market under the Care Act 2014. Findings: Attenders highly valued centres’ congregate nature and the continuity they offered which contributed to the development of person-centred relationships. Attenders exercised choice in attending day centres. Social work staff were more positive about day centres’ relevance to personalisation than those responsible for making decisions about the shape of local care services. Applications: With social isolation recognised as a serious risk of old age, the value of togetherness in group environments may need highlighting. Enactment of personalisation policies need not necessarily lead to individualisation; day centres may be community-based assets for some. Those shaping the care market may be encouraged to acknowledge wider outcomes, and frontline social workers may benefit from hearing positive experiences that may help in the development of effective care plans for older people who would like to benefit from day centre participation.

KW - Social work

KW - community care

KW - older people

KW - personalisation

KW - qualitative research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85090066847&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1468017320952255

DO - 10.1177/1468017320952255

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of Social Work

JF - Journal of Social Work

SN - 1468-0173

ER -

View graph of relations

© 2018 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454