Choosing Deafness with Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis: An Ethical Way to Carry on a Cultural Bloodline?

Silvia Camporesi*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

These words were written by ethicist Jonathan Glover in his paper “Future People, Disability and Screening” in 1992. Whereas screening and choosing for a disability remained a theoretical possibility 16 years ago, it has now become reality. In 2006, Susannah Baruch and colleagues at John Hopkins University published a survey of 190 American preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) clinics, and found that 3% reported having the intentional use of PGD “to select an embryo for the presence of a disability.” Even before, in 2002, a controversy was generated by the case of Candace A. McCullough and Sharon M. Duchesneau, a lesbian and deaf couple from Maryland who set out to have a deaf child (then, Gauvin) by intentionally soliciting a deaf sperm donor.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberN/A
Pages (from-to)86-96
Number of pages11
JournalCambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
Volume19
Issue number1
Early online date22 Dec 2009
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2010

Keywords

  • ATTITUDES
  • AUTONOMY
  • CHILD
  • deafness
  • PGD
  • preimplantation genetic diagnosis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Choosing Deafness with Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis: An Ethical Way to Carry on a Cultural Bloodline?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this