Abstract
This article examines an early refutation of Spinoza's Ethics by the Dutch Cartesian philosopher and theologian Christoph Wittich. Spinoza is often viewed as a radical Cartesian. But Wittich argues that Spinoza's methodology in fact diverges radically from that of Descartes (and is therefore deficient). Although it highlights many interesting features of Spinoza's and Descartes' methodologies, however, Wittich's argument is invalid. Wittich does not succeed in showing that Spinoza should not be regarded as a radical Cartesian.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Intellectual History Review |
| Publication status | Accepted/In press - 2013 |
Keywords
- Spinoza,
- Descartes,
- Cartesianism,
- method,
- Christoph Wittich,
- second notions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Christoph Wittich's Anti-Spinoza'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver