Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Christoph Wittich's Anti-Spinoza

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

This article examines an early refutation of Spinoza's Ethics by the Dutch Cartesian philosopher and theologian Christoph Wittich. Spinoza is often viewed as a radical Cartesian. But Wittich argues that Spinoza's methodology in fact diverges radically from that of Descartes (and is therefore deficient). Although it highlights many interesting features of Spinoza's and Descartes' methodologies, however, Wittich's argument is invalid. Wittich does not succeed in showing that Spinoza should not be regarded as a radical Cartesian.
Original languageEnglish
JournalIntellectual History Review
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2013

Keywords

  • Spinoza,
  • Descartes,
  • Cartesianism,
  • method,
  • Christoph Wittich,
  • second notions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Christoph Wittich's Anti-Spinoza'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this