Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Cognitive, Behavioural and Emotional processing vulnerability factors

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Citations (Scopus)
305 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract


Background: Cognitive-behavioural models of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) suggest that personality factors such as perfectionism and high moral standards may contribute to the development of CFS.

Aims: To investigate cognitive, behavioural and emotional processing risk factors for CFS.

Methods: CFS patients (n=67) at a UK specialist clinic completed questionnaires about psychological characteristics both currently and retrospectively (six months pre-CFS onset). Responses were compared to those of healthy individuals (n=73) who rated their current characteristics. Forty-four relatives retrospectively rated the premorbid psychological characteristics of the CFS participants.

Results: CFS patients showed similar levels of current perfectionism to controls, though higher premorbid perfectionism. CFS patients showed greater self-sacrificial beliefs and more unhelpful beliefs about experiencing and expressing negative emotions, both currently but more markedly prior to onset. In the six months pre-illness onset, CFS patients showed more disruption to their primary goal and greater general stress than controls. Ratings of premorbid psychological characteristics by relatives were consistent with patients’ self-reports. The extent of overinvestment in one goal was significantly associated with fatigue.

Conclusions: Perfectionism, self-sacrificial tendencies, unhelpful beliefs about emotions, and perceived stress may be present to a greater extent pre-morbidly in CFS patients compared to healthy individuals.
Original languageEnglish
JournalBehavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 30 Nov 2016

Keywords

  • chronic fatigue syndrome
  • aetiology
  • Causes
  • RISK

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Cognitive, Behavioural and Emotional processing vulnerability factors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this