Clarity and Confusion in Leveraged Finance Part 2: When and Why Lawyers Engineer Ambiguity

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Part 2 of this two-part article explores how the ambiguity and uncertainty in leveraged loan terms is not simply explainable by reference to market conditions; leveraged finance lawyers working in large international law firms in London have played a key role as engineers of this ambiguity. Lawyer activity in this sector is closely connected to the compromised independence of the lawyers who act for the bank lenders, symbolised by the controversial practice of lawyer designation. This compromised independence can in turn be understood as a consequence of the series of law firm and market-based dynamics which are explored in this article. The article also examines how the lawyers who act for private equity sponsors have, in response, engaged in contractual boundary pushing, a key element of which is the retention, insertion and exploitation of ambiguous drafting.
Original languageEnglish
JournalBUTTERWORTHS JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BANKING AND FINANCIAL LAW
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clarity and Confusion in Leveraged Finance Part 2: When and Why Lawyers Engineer Ambiguity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this