Clear in advance to whom? Exploring ‘transparency’ of assessment practices in UK higher education institution assessment policy

Chahna Gonsalves; Zhonghan Lin

doi:10.1080/03075079.2024.2381124

Clear in advance to whom? Exploring ‘transparency’ of assessment practices in UK higher education institution assessment policy

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

This study examines transparency in assessment practices within UK higher education institutions (HEIs), addressing a gap in how transparency is framed within policy documents. Employing content analysis on policy documents from 151 HEIs, we explore the multifaceted nature of transparency through techno-rational approaches, socio-cultural practices, and socio-material enactments to offer a nuanced understanding of transparency conceptualization and its intended audience. Findings indicate a predominant focus on techno-rational approaches – emphasizing clear documentation and information dissemination – while often overlooking the socio-cultural and socio-material dimensions crucial for thorough understanding and stakeholder engagement. We propose a nuanced framework integrating these three approaches, urging a shift beyond mere information disclosure to active stakeholder engagement with assessment criteria through dialogue and interaction. This research contributes to the discourse on transparency in assessment by offering theoretical and practical insights. Theoretically, it advances our understanding of transparency as a dynamic and contextually situated practice, challenging static conceptualizations. Practically, it provides a robust basis for refining assessment policies and practices, emphasizing clarity, comprehensibility, and inclusivity. By recognizing the diverse needs of stakeholders – students, educators, and assessors – the study advocates for policy enhancements that promote a deeper, actionable understanding of assessment practices. The findings lay the groundwork for future research on the conceptualization and impact of transparency in higher education, guiding more effective policy development and implementation. This study underscores the importance of comprehensive, well-articulated policies in fostering a shared understanding of transparent assessment practices within HEIs.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1-17
Journal	Studies in Higher Education
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2381124
Publication status	Published - 19 Jul 2024

Keywords

Assessment
Transparency
Communication
Institutional assessment policy
UK higher education

Access to Document

10.1080/03075079.2024.2381124

Cite this

@article{1923ed3701584ff1b758891cdee50331,

title = "Clear in advance to whom? Exploring {\textquoteleft}transparency{\textquoteright} of assessment practices in UK higher education institution assessment policy",

abstract = "This study examines transparency in assessment practices within UK higher education institutions (HEIs), addressing a gap in how transparency is framed within policy documents. Employing content analysis on policy documents from 151 HEIs, we explore the multifaceted nature of transparency through techno-rational approaches, socio-cultural practices, and socio-material enactments to offer a nuanced understanding of transparency conceptualization and its intended audience. Findings indicate a predominant focus on techno-rational approaches – emphasizing clear documentation and information dissemination – while often overlooking the socio-cultural and socio-material dimensions crucial for thorough understanding and stakeholder engagement. We propose a nuanced framework integrating these three approaches, urging a shift beyond mere information disclosure to active stakeholder engagement with assessment criteria through dialogue and interaction. This research contributes to the discourse on transparency in assessment by offering theoretical and practical insights. Theoretically, it advances our understanding of transparency as a dynamic and contextually situated practice, challenging static conceptualizations. Practically, it provides a robust basis for refining assessment policies and practices, emphasizing clarity, comprehensibility, and inclusivity. By recognizing the diverse needs of stakeholders – students, educators, and assessors – the study advocates for policy enhancements that promote a deeper, actionable understanding of assessment practices. The findings lay the groundwork for future research on the conceptualization and impact of transparency in higher education, guiding more effective policy development and implementation. This study underscores the importance of comprehensive, well-articulated policies in fostering a shared understanding of transparent assessment practices within HEIs.",

keywords = "Assessment, Transparency, Communication, Institutional assessment policy, UK higher education",

author = "Chahna Gonsalves and Zhonghan Lin",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.",

year = "2024",

month = jul,

day = "19",

doi = "10.1080/03075079.2024.2381124",

language = "English",

pages = "1--17",

journal = "Studies in Higher Education",

issn = "0307-5079",

publisher = "Routledge",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clear in advance to whom? Exploring ‘transparency’ of assessment practices in UK higher education institution assessment policy

AU - Gonsalves, Chahna

AU - Lin, Zhonghan

PY - 2024/7/19

Y1 - 2024/7/19

N2 - This study examines transparency in assessment practices within UK higher education institutions (HEIs), addressing a gap in how transparency is framed within policy documents. Employing content analysis on policy documents from 151 HEIs, we explore the multifaceted nature of transparency through techno-rational approaches, socio-cultural practices, and socio-material enactments to offer a nuanced understanding of transparency conceptualization and its intended audience. Findings indicate a predominant focus on techno-rational approaches – emphasizing clear documentation and information dissemination – while often overlooking the socio-cultural and socio-material dimensions crucial for thorough understanding and stakeholder engagement. We propose a nuanced framework integrating these three approaches, urging a shift beyond mere information disclosure to active stakeholder engagement with assessment criteria through dialogue and interaction. This research contributes to the discourse on transparency in assessment by offering theoretical and practical insights. Theoretically, it advances our understanding of transparency as a dynamic and contextually situated practice, challenging static conceptualizations. Practically, it provides a robust basis for refining assessment policies and practices, emphasizing clarity, comprehensibility, and inclusivity. By recognizing the diverse needs of stakeholders – students, educators, and assessors – the study advocates for policy enhancements that promote a deeper, actionable understanding of assessment practices. The findings lay the groundwork for future research on the conceptualization and impact of transparency in higher education, guiding more effective policy development and implementation. This study underscores the importance of comprehensive, well-articulated policies in fostering a shared understanding of transparent assessment practices within HEIs.

AB - This study examines transparency in assessment practices within UK higher education institutions (HEIs), addressing a gap in how transparency is framed within policy documents. Employing content analysis on policy documents from 151 HEIs, we explore the multifaceted nature of transparency through techno-rational approaches, socio-cultural practices, and socio-material enactments to offer a nuanced understanding of transparency conceptualization and its intended audience. Findings indicate a predominant focus on techno-rational approaches – emphasizing clear documentation and information dissemination – while often overlooking the socio-cultural and socio-material dimensions crucial for thorough understanding and stakeholder engagement. We propose a nuanced framework integrating these three approaches, urging a shift beyond mere information disclosure to active stakeholder engagement with assessment criteria through dialogue and interaction. This research contributes to the discourse on transparency in assessment by offering theoretical and practical insights. Theoretically, it advances our understanding of transparency as a dynamic and contextually situated practice, challenging static conceptualizations. Practically, it provides a robust basis for refining assessment policies and practices, emphasizing clarity, comprehensibility, and inclusivity. By recognizing the diverse needs of stakeholders – students, educators, and assessors – the study advocates for policy enhancements that promote a deeper, actionable understanding of assessment practices. The findings lay the groundwork for future research on the conceptualization and impact of transparency in higher education, guiding more effective policy development and implementation. This study underscores the importance of comprehensive, well-articulated policies in fostering a shared understanding of transparent assessment practices within HEIs.

KW - Assessment

KW - Transparency

KW - Communication

KW - Institutional assessment policy

KW - UK higher education

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85198852697&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/03075079.2024.2381124

DO - 10.1080/03075079.2024.2381124

M3 - Article

SN - 0307-5079

SP - 1

EP - 17

JO - Studies in Higher Education

JF - Studies in Higher Education

ER -

Clear in advance to whom? Exploring ‘transparency’ of assessment practices in UK higher education institution assessment policy

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this