King's College London

Research portal

Clinical and demographic differences between patients with manic, depressive and schizophrenia-spectrum psychoses presenting to Early Intervention Services in London

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Adisha Kapila, Helen L Fisher, Sonia Johnson, Barnaby Major, Nikola Rahaman, John Joyce, Nick Chamberlain-Kent, Jo Lawrence, Allan H Young, James M Stone

Original languageEnglish
JournalEarly Intervention in Psychiatry
Publication statusPublished - 15 Oct 2017


  • clinical_features_fep_uf

    clinical_features_fep_uf.docx, 47.1 KB, application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document


    Submitted manuscript

King's Authors


AIM: To investigate the relationship between the presenting clinical and demographic characteristics in first-episode psychosis (FEP) patients with their clinical diagnostic grouping 1 year later.

METHODS: Data from 1014 first-presentation psychosis patients from seven London-based Early Intervention Services were extracted from the MiData audit database. Associations between clinical and demographic measures at presentation and clinical diagnosis made at 1 year were assessed with analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Chi-square tests.

RESULTS: The sample comprised 76% of patients with schizophrenia-spectrum diagnoses, 9% with manic psychoses (MP) and 6% with depressive psychoses. Compared to the other 2 groups, patients who were diagnosed as having MP were younger, with higher education and shorter duration of untreated psychosis, and had higher Young Mania Rating Scale scores at presentation and lower Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) negative scores. Patients diagnosed at 1 year as having depressive psychosis were older and more likely to be white, with the lowest PANSS positive scores at baseline. Patients diagnosed at 1 year as having schizophrenia spectrum diagnoses were more likely to be males. Patients in the 3 diagnostic subgroups of psychosis differed on both clinical and demographic characteristics at presentation.

CONCLUSIONS: There were significant clinical and demographic differences at presentation between FEP patients who received different clinical diagnoses at 1 year. Future work should determine the extent to which these differences can be used to guide clinical care.

Download statistics

No data available

View graph of relations

© 2018 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454