Clinician Administered and Self-Report Survey Both Effective for Identifying Fecal Incontinence in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Lesley Dibley, Ailsa Hart, Julie Duncan, Charles H Knowles, Sally Kerry, Doris Lanz, Vichithranie W Madurasinghe, Tiffany Wade, Helen Terry, Azmina Verjee, Mandy Fader, Christine Norton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To test two methods for reporting of fecal incontinence (FI) in people with inflammatory bowel disease.

METHODS: Consecutive patients from IBD clinics in six UK hospitals completed a short three-item case-finding survey about FI; they either completed the survey themselves or were asked the same questions face to face by a clinician.

RESULTS: Of 1336 eligible patients with complete data (48% male; mean 43 years; 55% Crohn's disease, 41% ulcerative colitis), 772 were asked about FI face to face, and 564 self-completed the survey: FI was reported in 63% and 56%, respectively (p = 0.012). In regression analyses, those aged 51-60, having Crohn's disease and higher disease activity, were more likely to report FI. Of all respondents, 38.7% were interested in receiving help for their incontinence.

CONCLUSIONS: Fecal incontinence affects the majority of people with IBD. Although more patients reported fecal incontinence when asked face to face than self-reported, routine screening by either method in clinical practice is recommended. Over one-third of patients with IBD want help for bowel control problems.

Original languageEnglish
JournalDigestive Diseases and Sciences
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 20 Jun 2020

Keywords

  • Bowel control
  • Fecal incontinence
  • Inflammatory bowel disease
  • Screening
  • Urgency

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinician Administered and Self-Report Survey Both Effective for Identifying Fecal Incontinence in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this