King's College London

Research portal

Clinicians’ Experiences of Instrumented Gait Analysis in Management of Patients with Cerebral Palsy: A Qualitative Study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Anna Hebda-Boon, Bairu Zhang, Augustine Amankwah, Adam P. Shortland, Dylan Morrissey

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)403-415
Number of pages13
JournalPhysical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics
Issue number4
Early online date15 Feb 2022
Accepted/In press30 Jan 2022
E-pub ahead of print15 Feb 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information: This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.


King's Authors


Aim: To identify the interaction of instrumented gait analysis (IGA) training, expertise, and application in gait-related management of cerebral palsy. Methods: Semi-structured interviews with 20 purposively sampled clinicians with varying professional backgrounds, expertise, and training, analyzed using the framework method. Results: Fifteen sub-themes were identified within three domains: training, equipment/outputs, and roles/reasons under the core theme IGA practice. Findings were illustrated using the Experience/Equipment/Roles/Training (Exp-ERT) Framework which identifies four user categories–based on influencing factors, beset by barriers, with experience reported as a common enabling factor. Clinicians who encountered barriers in one of the domains were categorized as either “frustrated” or “hesitant” users. Those who were no longer using IGA for clinical decisions were designated “confident non-users”. Finally, the ‘confident experts’ reported the required level of training and access to interpret IGA outputs for clinical decision-making. Expertise gained at any level of clinical practice was shown to initiate advancement within domains. Conclusions: Clinicians encounter a multitude of barriers to IGA practice that can result in failure to progress or impact on clinical decision-making. The Exp-ERT Framework emerges strongly from the data and could serve as an evaluation tool to diagnose barriers to confident expertise and support IGA-related professional development planning.

Download statistics

No data available

View graph of relations

© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454