Cloning, zoning and the harm principle

Roger Brownsword

doi:10.4324/9781315582450-41

Cloning, zoning and the harm principle

Roger Brownsword^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Laws

University of Sheffield

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review

Abstract

We accept that [in] a society that is both multi-faith and largely secular, there is never going to be consensus on… the role of the state in reproductive decision-making. There are no demonstrably ‘right’ answers to the complex ethical, moral and political equations involved… We recognise the difficulty of achieving consensus between protagonists in opposing camps.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	First Do No Harm
Subtitle of host publication	Law, Ethics and Healthcare
Publisher	Taylor and Francis Ltd.
Pages	527-542
Number of pages	16
ISBN (Electronic)	9781317134985
ISBN (Print)	9780754626145
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315582450-41
Publication status	Published - 1 Jan 2016

Access to Document

10.4324/9781315582450-41

Cite this

@inbook{9d5cdc242fb74e95b3216fdf5323a7d6,

title = "Cloning, zoning and the harm principle",

abstract = "We accept that [in] a society that is both multi-faith and largely secular, there is never going to be consensus on… the role of the state in reproductive decision-making. There are no demonstrably {\textquoteleft}right{\textquoteright} answers to the complex ethical, moral and political equations involved… We recognise the difficulty of achieving consensus between protagonists in opposing camps.",

author = "Roger Brownsword",

year = "2016",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.4324/9781315582450-41",

language = "English",

isbn = "9780754626145",

pages = "527--542",

booktitle = "First Do No Harm",

publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",

address = "United Kingdom",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Cloning, zoning and the harm principle

AU - Brownsword, Roger

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - We accept that [in] a society that is both multi-faith and largely secular, there is never going to be consensus on… the role of the state in reproductive decision-making. There are no demonstrably ‘right’ answers to the complex ethical, moral and political equations involved… We recognise the difficulty of achieving consensus between protagonists in opposing camps.

AB - We accept that [in] a society that is both multi-faith and largely secular, there is never going to be consensus on… the role of the state in reproductive decision-making. There are no demonstrably ‘right’ answers to the complex ethical, moral and political equations involved… We recognise the difficulty of achieving consensus between protagonists in opposing camps.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084883148&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4324/9781315582450-41

DO - 10.4324/9781315582450-41

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85084883148

SN - 9780754626145

SP - 527

EP - 542

BT - First Do No Harm

PB - Taylor and Francis Ltd.

ER -

Cloning, zoning and the harm principle

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this