Commodity traders in a storm: Financialization, corporate power and ecological crisis

Joseph Baines, Sandy Brian Hager

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)
311 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Commodity trading firms occupy a central position in global supply chains and their activities have been associated with financial instability, social upheaval and manifold forms of ecological devastation. This paper examines these companies in the context of debates regarding corporate financialization. We find that since the 2003–2011 commodity boom, trading firms have become less financialized in terms of the source of their profits as they have shifted away from financial activities. However, they have become more financialized in terms of the destination of profits, with dividend and share repurchase commitments reaching new heights after 2015. In view of this finding, we inquire into whether trading firms’ growing commitment to shareholder payouts will encourage them to continue to prioritize short-term returns, or whether instead these firms’ linkages to financial markets will lend clout to financial activists concerned by the long-term environmental and social consequences of their operations. Ultimately, we find several sources of commodity trader resilience which insulate them from shareholder resolutions and divestment campaigns aimed at curbing ecological destruction and human rights abuses in their supply chains. We accordingly suggest that pressures from activist investors must be complemented with more wide-ranging efforts to defend living systems across the planet.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-58
Number of pages58
JournalREVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL ECONOMY
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Jan 2021

Keywords

  • Commodity trading firms, ecological crisis, financialization, corporate power, shareholder value, financial activism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Commodity traders in a storm: Financialization, corporate power and ecological crisis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this