King's College London

Research portal

Comparing the effectiveness of an enhanced MOtiVational intErviewing InTervention (MOVE IT) with usual care for reducing cardiovascular risk in high risk subjects: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Standard

Comparing the effectiveness of an enhanced MOtiVational intErviewing InTervention (MOVE IT) with usual care for reducing cardiovascular risk in high risk subjects : study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. / Bayley, Adam; de Zoysa, Nicole; Cook, Derek G.; Whincup, Peter H.; Stahl, Daniel; Twist, Katherine; Ridge, Katie; McCrone, Paul; Treasure, Janet; Ashworth, Mark; Greenough, Anne; Blythe, Clare; Winkley, Kirsty; Ismail, Khalida.

In: Trials, Vol. 16, 112, 25.03.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

Bayley, A, de Zoysa, N, Cook, DG, Whincup, PH, Stahl, D, Twist, K, Ridge, K, McCrone, P, Treasure, J, Ashworth, M, Greenough, A, Blythe, C, Winkley, K & Ismail, K 2015, 'Comparing the effectiveness of an enhanced MOtiVational intErviewing InTervention (MOVE IT) with usual care for reducing cardiovascular risk in high risk subjects: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial', Trials, vol. 16, 112. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0593-5

APA

Bayley, A., de Zoysa, N., Cook, D. G., Whincup, P. H., Stahl, D., Twist, K., Ridge, K., McCrone, P., Treasure, J., Ashworth, M., Greenough, A., Blythe, C., Winkley, K., & Ismail, K. (2015). Comparing the effectiveness of an enhanced MOtiVational intErviewing InTervention (MOVE IT) with usual care for reducing cardiovascular risk in high risk subjects: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials, 16, [112]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0593-5

Vancouver

Bayley A, de Zoysa N, Cook DG, Whincup PH, Stahl D, Twist K et al. Comparing the effectiveness of an enhanced MOtiVational intErviewing InTervention (MOVE IT) with usual care for reducing cardiovascular risk in high risk subjects: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2015 Mar 25;16. 112. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0593-5

Author

Bayley, Adam ; de Zoysa, Nicole ; Cook, Derek G. ; Whincup, Peter H. ; Stahl, Daniel ; Twist, Katherine ; Ridge, Katie ; McCrone, Paul ; Treasure, Janet ; Ashworth, Mark ; Greenough, Anne ; Blythe, Clare ; Winkley, Kirsty ; Ismail, Khalida. / Comparing the effectiveness of an enhanced MOtiVational intErviewing InTervention (MOVE IT) with usual care for reducing cardiovascular risk in high risk subjects : study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. In: Trials. 2015 ; Vol. 16.

Bibtex Download

@article{8239e46da97643c2a6853bc9e79c00a7,
title = "Comparing the effectiveness of an enhanced MOtiVational intErviewing InTervention (MOVE IT) with usual care for reducing cardiovascular risk in high risk subjects: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial",
abstract = "Background: Interventions targeting multiple risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD), including poor diet and physical inactivity, are more effective than interventions targeting a single risk factor. A motivational interviewing (MI) intervention can provide modest dietary improvements and physical activity increases, while adding cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) skills may enhance the effects of MI. We designed a randomised controlled trial (RCT) to examine whether specific behaviour change techniques integrating MI and CBT result in favourable changes in weight and physical activity in those at high risk of CVD. A group and individual intervention will be compared to usual care. A group intervention offers potential benefits from social support and may be more cost effective.Methods/Design: Individuals aged between 40 and 74 years in 11 South London Clinical Commissioning Groups who are at high risk of developing CVD (>= 20%) in the next 10 years will be recruited. A sample of 1,704 participants will be randomised to receive the enhanced MI intervention, delivered by trained healthy lifestyle facilitators (HLFs), in group or individual formats, in 10 sessions (plus an introductory session) over one year, or usual care. Randomisation will be conducted by King's College London Clinical Trials Unit and researchers collecting outcome data will be blinded to treatment allocation. At 12-month and 24-month follow-up assessments, primary outcomes will be change in weight and physical activity (average steps per day). Secondary outcomes include changes in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and CVD risk score. Incidence of CVD events since baseline will be recorded. A process evaluation will be conducted to evaluate factors which impact on delivery, adherence and outcome. An economic evaluation will estimate relative cost-effectiveness of each type of intervention delivery.Discussion: This RCT assesses the effectiveness of a healthy lifestyle intervention for people at high risk of CVD. Benefits of the study include the ethnic and socioeconomic diversity of the study population and that, via social support within the group setting and long-term follow-up period, the intervention offers the potential to support maintenance of a healthy lifestyle.",
keywords = "Cardiovascular disease, Physical activity, Diet, Accelerometer, Motivational interviewing, CBT, Primary care, Health trainers, COGNITIVE-BEHAVIOR THERAPY, CAUSE-SPECIFIC MORTALITY, PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY, WEIGHT-LOSS, MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION, VASCULAR MORTALITY, GLYCEMIC CONTROL, INDIVIDUAL DATA, BLOOD-PRESSURE, METAANALYSIS",
author = "Adam Bayley and {de Zoysa}, Nicole and Cook, {Derek G.} and Whincup, {Peter H.} and Daniel Stahl and Katherine Twist and Katie Ridge and Paul McCrone and Janet Treasure and Mark Ashworth and Anne Greenough and Clare Blythe and Kirsty Winkley and Khalida Ismail",
year = "2015",
month = mar,
day = "25",
doi = "10.1186/s13063-015-0593-5",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
journal = "Trials",
issn = "1745-6215",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing the effectiveness of an enhanced MOtiVational intErviewing InTervention (MOVE IT) with usual care for reducing cardiovascular risk in high risk subjects

T2 - study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

AU - Bayley, Adam

AU - de Zoysa, Nicole

AU - Cook, Derek G.

AU - Whincup, Peter H.

AU - Stahl, Daniel

AU - Twist, Katherine

AU - Ridge, Katie

AU - McCrone, Paul

AU - Treasure, Janet

AU - Ashworth, Mark

AU - Greenough, Anne

AU - Blythe, Clare

AU - Winkley, Kirsty

AU - Ismail, Khalida

PY - 2015/3/25

Y1 - 2015/3/25

N2 - Background: Interventions targeting multiple risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD), including poor diet and physical inactivity, are more effective than interventions targeting a single risk factor. A motivational interviewing (MI) intervention can provide modest dietary improvements and physical activity increases, while adding cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) skills may enhance the effects of MI. We designed a randomised controlled trial (RCT) to examine whether specific behaviour change techniques integrating MI and CBT result in favourable changes in weight and physical activity in those at high risk of CVD. A group and individual intervention will be compared to usual care. A group intervention offers potential benefits from social support and may be more cost effective.Methods/Design: Individuals aged between 40 and 74 years in 11 South London Clinical Commissioning Groups who are at high risk of developing CVD (>= 20%) in the next 10 years will be recruited. A sample of 1,704 participants will be randomised to receive the enhanced MI intervention, delivered by trained healthy lifestyle facilitators (HLFs), in group or individual formats, in 10 sessions (plus an introductory session) over one year, or usual care. Randomisation will be conducted by King's College London Clinical Trials Unit and researchers collecting outcome data will be blinded to treatment allocation. At 12-month and 24-month follow-up assessments, primary outcomes will be change in weight and physical activity (average steps per day). Secondary outcomes include changes in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and CVD risk score. Incidence of CVD events since baseline will be recorded. A process evaluation will be conducted to evaluate factors which impact on delivery, adherence and outcome. An economic evaluation will estimate relative cost-effectiveness of each type of intervention delivery.Discussion: This RCT assesses the effectiveness of a healthy lifestyle intervention for people at high risk of CVD. Benefits of the study include the ethnic and socioeconomic diversity of the study population and that, via social support within the group setting and long-term follow-up period, the intervention offers the potential to support maintenance of a healthy lifestyle.

AB - Background: Interventions targeting multiple risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD), including poor diet and physical inactivity, are more effective than interventions targeting a single risk factor. A motivational interviewing (MI) intervention can provide modest dietary improvements and physical activity increases, while adding cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) skills may enhance the effects of MI. We designed a randomised controlled trial (RCT) to examine whether specific behaviour change techniques integrating MI and CBT result in favourable changes in weight and physical activity in those at high risk of CVD. A group and individual intervention will be compared to usual care. A group intervention offers potential benefits from social support and may be more cost effective.Methods/Design: Individuals aged between 40 and 74 years in 11 South London Clinical Commissioning Groups who are at high risk of developing CVD (>= 20%) in the next 10 years will be recruited. A sample of 1,704 participants will be randomised to receive the enhanced MI intervention, delivered by trained healthy lifestyle facilitators (HLFs), in group or individual formats, in 10 sessions (plus an introductory session) over one year, or usual care. Randomisation will be conducted by King's College London Clinical Trials Unit and researchers collecting outcome data will be blinded to treatment allocation. At 12-month and 24-month follow-up assessments, primary outcomes will be change in weight and physical activity (average steps per day). Secondary outcomes include changes in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and CVD risk score. Incidence of CVD events since baseline will be recorded. A process evaluation will be conducted to evaluate factors which impact on delivery, adherence and outcome. An economic evaluation will estimate relative cost-effectiveness of each type of intervention delivery.Discussion: This RCT assesses the effectiveness of a healthy lifestyle intervention for people at high risk of CVD. Benefits of the study include the ethnic and socioeconomic diversity of the study population and that, via social support within the group setting and long-term follow-up period, the intervention offers the potential to support maintenance of a healthy lifestyle.

KW - Cardiovascular disease

KW - Physical activity

KW - Diet

KW - Accelerometer

KW - Motivational interviewing

KW - CBT

KW - Primary care

KW - Health trainers

KW - COGNITIVE-BEHAVIOR THERAPY

KW - CAUSE-SPECIFIC MORTALITY

KW - PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY

KW - WEIGHT-LOSS

KW - MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION

KW - VASCULAR MORTALITY

KW - GLYCEMIC CONTROL

KW - INDIVIDUAL DATA

KW - BLOOD-PRESSURE

KW - METAANALYSIS

U2 - 10.1186/s13063-015-0593-5

DO - 10.1186/s13063-015-0593-5

M3 - Article

VL - 16

JO - Trials

JF - Trials

SN - 1745-6215

M1 - 112

ER -

View graph of relations

© 2018 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454