King's College London

Research portal

Comparison of In vivo and Ex vivo MRI for the detection of structural abnormalities in a mouse model of tauopathy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Holly E. Holmes, Nick M. Powell, Da Ma, Ozama Ismail, Ian F. Harrison, Jack A. Wells, Niall Colgan, James M. O’Callaghan, Ross A. Johnson, Tracey K. Murray, Zeshan Ahmed, Morten Heggenes, Alice Fisher, M. Jorge Cardoso, Marc Modat, Michael J. O’Neill, Emily C. Collins, Elizabeth M.C. Fisher, Sébastien Ourselin, Mark F. Lythgoe

Original languageEnglish
Article number20
JournalFrontiers in Neuroinformatics
Volume11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Mar 2017

King's Authors

Abstract

With increasingly large numbers of mouse models of human disease dedicated to MRI studies, compromises between in vivo and ex vivo MRI must be fully understood in order to inform the choice of imaging methodology. We investigate the application of high resolution in vivo and ex vivo MRI, in combination with tensor-based morphometry (TBM), to uncover morphological differences in the rTg4510 mouse model of tauopathy. The rTg4510 mouse also offers a novel paradigm by which the overexpression of mutant tau can be regulated by the administration of doxycycline, providing us with a platformon which toinvestigate more subtle alterations in morphology with morphometry. Both in vivo and ex vivo MRI allowed the detection of widespread bilateral patterns of atrophy in the rTg4510 mouse brain relative to wild-type controls. Regions of volume loss aligned with neuronal loss and pathological tau accumulation demonstrated by immunohistochemistry. When we sought to investigate more subtle structural alterations in the rTg4510 mice relative to a subset of doxycycline-treated rTg4510 mice, ex vivo imaging enabled the detection of more regions of morphological brain changes. The disadvantages of ex vivo MRI may however mitigate this increase in sensitivity: we observed a 10% global shrinkage in brain volume of the post-mortem tissues due to formalin fixation, which was most notable in the cerebellum and olfactory bulbs. However, many central brain regions were not adversely affected by the fixation protocol, perhaps due to our “in-skull” preparation. The disparity between our TBM findings from in vivo and ex vivo MRI underlines the importance of appropriate study design, given the trade-off between these two imaging approaches. We support the utility of in vivo MRI for morphological phenotyping of mouse models of disease; however, for subtler phenotypes, ex vivo offers enhanced sensitivity to discrete morphological changes.

View graph of relations

© 2018 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454