Comparison of Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and Hospital Anxiety and Depression – Depression subscale scores by administration mode: An individual participant data differential item functioning meta-analysis

DEPRESsion Screening Data (DEPRESSD) Collaboration; Daphna Harel; Yin Wu; Brooke Levis; Suiqiong Fan; Ying Sun; Mingyao Xu; Danielle B. Rice; Jill Boruff; Sarah Markham; John P.A. Ioannidis; Yemisi Takwoingi; Scott B. Patten; Roy C. Ziegelstein; Pim Cuijpers; Simon Gilbody; Simone Vigod; Dickens Akena; Andrea Benedetti; Brett D. Thombs; Marleine Azar; Parash Mani Bhandari; Matthew J. Chiovitti; Chen He; Mahrukh Imran; Ankur Krishnan; Zelalem Negeri; Dipika Neupane; Kira E. Riehm; Xin Wei Yan; Lorie A. Kloda; Melissa Henry; Zahinoor Ismail; Carmen G. Loiselle; Nicholas D. Mitchell; Samir Al-Adawi; Rubén Alvarado; Dagmar Amtmann; Bruce Arroll; Liat Ayalon; Hamid R. Baradaran; Jacqueline Barnes; Kevin R. Beck; Cheryl Tatano Beck; Charles N. Bernstein; Carola Bindt; Louise M. Howard; Crick Lund; Susan J. Pawlby; Kylee Trevillion; Kirsty Winkley

doi:10.1016/j.jad.2024.06.033

Comparison of Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and Hospital Anxiety and Depression – Depression subscale scores by administration mode: An individual participant data differential item functioning meta-analysis

DEPRESsion Screening Data (DEPRESSD) Collaboration, Daphna Harel^*, Yin Wu, Brooke Levis, Suiqiong Fan, Ying Sun, Mingyao Xu, Danielle B. Rice, Jill Boruff, Sarah Markham, John P.A. Ioannidis, Yemisi Takwoingi, Scott B. Patten, Roy C. Ziegelstein, Pim Cuijpers, Simon Gilbody, Simone Vigod, Dickens Akena, Andrea Benedetti, Brett D. ThombsMarleine Azar, Parash Mani Bhandari, Matthew J. Chiovitti, Chen He, Mahrukh Imran, Ankur Krishnan, Zelalem Negeri, Dipika Neupane, Kira E. Riehm, Xin Wei Yan, Lorie A. Kloda, Melissa Henry, Zahinoor Ismail, Carmen G. Loiselle, Nicholas D. Mitchell, Samir Al-Adawi, Rubén Alvarado, Dagmar Amtmann, Bruce Arroll, Liat Ayalon, Hamid R. Baradaran, Jacqueline Barnes, Kevin R. Beck, Cheryl Tatano Beck, Charles N. Bernstein, Carola Bindt, Louise M. Howard, Crick Lund, Susan J. Pawlby, Kylee Trevillion, Kirsty Winkley

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Administration mode of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) may influence responses. We assessed if Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale – Depression subscale (HADS-D) item responses and scores were associated with administration mode. We compared (1) self-administration versus interview-administration; within self-administration (2) research or medical setting versus private; and (3) pen-and-paper versus electronic; and within interview-administration (4) in-person versus phone. We analysed individual participant data meta-analysis datasets with item-level data for the PHQ-9 (N = 34,529), EPDS (N = 16,813), and HADS-D (N = 16,768). We used multiple indicator multiple cause models to assess differential item functioning (DIF) by administration mode. We found statistically significant DIF for most items on all measures due to large samples, but influence on total scores was negligible. In 10 comparisons conducted across the PHQ-9, EPDS, and HADS-D, Pearson's correlations and intraclass correlation coefficients between latent depression symptom scores from models that did or did not account for DIF were between 0.995 and 1.000. Total PHQ-9, EPDS, and HADS-D scores did not differ materially across administration modes. Researcher and clinicians who evaluate depression symptoms with these questionnaires can select administration methods based on patient preferences, feasibility, or cost.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	674-683
Number of pages	10
Journal	Journal of Affective Disorders
Volume	361
Early online date	21 Jun 2024
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.06.033
Publication status	Published - 15 Sept 2024

Keywords

Depression
EPDS
HADS
Mode of administration
PHQ-9

Access to Document

10.1016/j.jad.2024.06.033

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and Hospital Anxiety and Depression – Depression subscale scores by administration mode: An individual participant data differential item functioning meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

DEPRESsion Screening Data (DEPRESSD) Collaboration, Harel, D., Wu, Y., Levis, B., Fan, S., Sun, Y., Xu, M., Rice, D. B., Boruff, J., Markham, S., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Takwoingi, Y., Patten, S. B., Ziegelstein, R. C., Cuijpers, P., Gilbody, S., Vigod, S., Akena, D., Benedetti, A., ... Winkley, K. (2024). Comparison of Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and Hospital Anxiety and Depression – Depression subscale scores by administration mode: An individual participant data differential item functioning meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 361, 674-683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.06.033

DEPRESsion Screening Data (DEPRESSD) Collaboration ; Harel, Daphna ; Wu, Yin et al. / Comparison of Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and Hospital Anxiety and Depression – Depression subscale scores by administration mode : An individual participant data differential item functioning meta-analysis. In: Journal of Affective Disorders. 2024 ; Vol. 361. pp. 674-683.

@article{cddc3ec909244a05a367ead7449db4b4,

title = "Comparison of Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and Hospital Anxiety and Depression – Depression subscale scores by administration mode: An individual participant data differential item functioning meta-analysis",

abstract = "Administration mode of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) may influence responses. We assessed if Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale – Depression subscale (HADS-D) item responses and scores were associated with administration mode. We compared (1) self-administration versus interview-administration; within self-administration (2) research or medical setting versus private; and (3) pen-and-paper versus electronic; and within interview-administration (4) in-person versus phone. We analysed individual participant data meta-analysis datasets with item-level data for the PHQ-9 (N = 34,529), EPDS (N = 16,813), and HADS-D (N = 16,768). We used multiple indicator multiple cause models to assess differential item functioning (DIF) by administration mode. We found statistically significant DIF for most items on all measures due to large samples, but influence on total scores was negligible. In 10 comparisons conducted across the PHQ-9, EPDS, and HADS-D, Pearson's correlations and intraclass correlation coefficients between latent depression symptom scores from models that did or did not account for DIF were between 0.995 and 1.000. Total PHQ-9, EPDS, and HADS-D scores did not differ materially across administration modes. Researcher and clinicians who evaluate depression symptoms with these questionnaires can select administration methods based on patient preferences, feasibility, or cost.",

keywords = "Depression, EPDS, HADS, Mode of administration, PHQ-9",

author = "{DEPRESsion Screening Data (DEPRESSD) Collaboration} and Daphna Harel and Yin Wu and Brooke Levis and Suiqiong Fan and Ying Sun and Mingyao Xu and Rice, {Danielle B.} and Jill Boruff and Sarah Markham and Ioannidis, {John P.A.} and Yemisi Takwoingi and Patten, {Scott B.} and Ziegelstein, {Roy C.} and Pim Cuijpers and Simon Gilbody and Simone Vigod and Dickens Akena and Andrea Benedetti and Thombs, {Brett D.} and Marleine Azar and Bhandari, {Parash Mani} and Chiovitti, {Matthew J.} and Chen He and Mahrukh Imran and Ankur Krishnan and Zelalem Negeri and Dipika Neupane and Riehm, {Kira E.} and Yan, {Xin Wei} and Kloda, {Lorie A.} and Melissa Henry and Zahinoor Ismail and Loiselle, {Carmen G.} and Mitchell, {Nicholas D.} and Samir Al-Adawi and Rub{\'e}n Alvarado and Dagmar Amtmann and Bruce Arroll and Liat Ayalon and Baradaran, {Hamid R.} and Jacqueline Barnes and Beck, {Kevin R.} and Beck, {Cheryl Tatano} and Bernstein, {Charles N.} and Carola Bindt and Howard, {Louise M.} and Crick Lund and Pawlby, {Susan J.} and Kylee Trevillion and Kirsty Winkley",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024 Elsevier B.V.",

year = "2024",

month = sep,

day = "15",

doi = "10.1016/j.jad.2024.06.033",

language = "English",

volume = "361",

pages = "674--683",

journal = "Journal of Affective Disorders",

issn = "0165-0327",

publisher = "Elsevier",

}

DEPRESsion Screening Data (DEPRESSD) Collaboration, Harel, D, Wu, Y, Levis, B, Fan, S, Sun, Y, Xu, M, Rice, DB, Boruff, J, Markham, S, Ioannidis, JPA, Takwoingi, Y, Patten, SB, Ziegelstein, RC, Cuijpers, P, Gilbody, S, Vigod, S, Akena, D, Benedetti, A, Thombs, BD, Azar, M, Bhandari, PM, Chiovitti, MJ, He, C, Imran, M, Krishnan, A, Negeri, Z, Neupane, D, Riehm, KE, Yan, XW, Kloda, LA, Henry, M, Ismail, Z, Loiselle, CG, Mitchell, ND, Al-Adawi, S, Alvarado, R, Amtmann, D, Arroll, B, Ayalon, L, Baradaran, HR, Barnes, J, Beck, KR, Beck, CT, Bernstein, CN, Bindt, C, Howard, LM , Lund, C , Pawlby, SJ , Trevillion, K & Winkley, K 2024, 'Comparison of Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and Hospital Anxiety and Depression – Depression subscale scores by administration mode: An individual participant data differential item functioning meta-analysis', Journal of Affective Disorders, vol. 361, pp. 674-683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.06.033

Comparison of Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and Hospital Anxiety and Depression – Depression subscale scores by administration mode: An individual participant data differential item functioning meta-analysis. / DEPRESsion Screening Data (DEPRESSD) Collaboration; Harel, Daphna; Wu, Yin et al.
In: Journal of Affective Disorders, Vol. 361, 15.09.2024, p. 674-683.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and Hospital Anxiety and Depression – Depression subscale scores by administration mode

T2 - An individual participant data differential item functioning meta-analysis

AU - DEPRESsion Screening Data (DEPRESSD) Collaboration

AU - Harel, Daphna

AU - Wu, Yin

AU - Levis, Brooke

AU - Fan, Suiqiong

AU - Sun, Ying

AU - Xu, Mingyao

AU - Rice, Danielle B.

AU - Boruff, Jill

AU - Markham, Sarah

AU - Ioannidis, John P.A.

AU - Takwoingi, Yemisi

AU - Patten, Scott B.

AU - Ziegelstein, Roy C.

AU - Cuijpers, Pim

AU - Gilbody, Simon

AU - Vigod, Simone

AU - Akena, Dickens

AU - Benedetti, Andrea

AU - Thombs, Brett D.

AU - Azar, Marleine

AU - Bhandari, Parash Mani

AU - Chiovitti, Matthew J.

AU - He, Chen

AU - Imran, Mahrukh

AU - Krishnan, Ankur

AU - Negeri, Zelalem

AU - Neupane, Dipika

AU - Riehm, Kira E.

AU - Yan, Xin Wei

AU - Kloda, Lorie A.

AU - Henry, Melissa

AU - Ismail, Zahinoor

AU - Loiselle, Carmen G.

AU - Mitchell, Nicholas D.

AU - Al-Adawi, Samir

AU - Alvarado, Rubén

AU - Amtmann, Dagmar

AU - Arroll, Bruce

AU - Ayalon, Liat

AU - Baradaran, Hamid R.

AU - Barnes, Jacqueline

AU - Beck, Kevin R.

AU - Beck, Cheryl Tatano

AU - Bernstein, Charles N.

AU - Bindt, Carola

AU - Howard, Louise M.

AU - Lund, Crick

AU - Pawlby, Susan J.

AU - Trevillion, Kylee

AU - Winkley, Kirsty

PY - 2024/9/15

Y1 - 2024/9/15

N2 - Administration mode of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) may influence responses. We assessed if Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale – Depression subscale (HADS-D) item responses and scores were associated with administration mode. We compared (1) self-administration versus interview-administration; within self-administration (2) research or medical setting versus private; and (3) pen-and-paper versus electronic; and within interview-administration (4) in-person versus phone. We analysed individual participant data meta-analysis datasets with item-level data for the PHQ-9 (N = 34,529), EPDS (N = 16,813), and HADS-D (N = 16,768). We used multiple indicator multiple cause models to assess differential item functioning (DIF) by administration mode. We found statistically significant DIF for most items on all measures due to large samples, but influence on total scores was negligible. In 10 comparisons conducted across the PHQ-9, EPDS, and HADS-D, Pearson's correlations and intraclass correlation coefficients between latent depression symptom scores from models that did or did not account for DIF were between 0.995 and 1.000. Total PHQ-9, EPDS, and HADS-D scores did not differ materially across administration modes. Researcher and clinicians who evaluate depression symptoms with these questionnaires can select administration methods based on patient preferences, feasibility, or cost.

AB - Administration mode of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) may influence responses. We assessed if Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale – Depression subscale (HADS-D) item responses and scores were associated with administration mode. We compared (1) self-administration versus interview-administration; within self-administration (2) research or medical setting versus private; and (3) pen-and-paper versus electronic; and within interview-administration (4) in-person versus phone. We analysed individual participant data meta-analysis datasets with item-level data for the PHQ-9 (N = 34,529), EPDS (N = 16,813), and HADS-D (N = 16,768). We used multiple indicator multiple cause models to assess differential item functioning (DIF) by administration mode. We found statistically significant DIF for most items on all measures due to large samples, but influence on total scores was negligible. In 10 comparisons conducted across the PHQ-9, EPDS, and HADS-D, Pearson's correlations and intraclass correlation coefficients between latent depression symptom scores from models that did or did not account for DIF were between 0.995 and 1.000. Total PHQ-9, EPDS, and HADS-D scores did not differ materially across administration modes. Researcher and clinicians who evaluate depression symptoms with these questionnaires can select administration methods based on patient preferences, feasibility, or cost.

KW - Depression

KW - EPDS

KW - HADS

KW - Mode of administration

KW - PHQ-9

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85197374254&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jad.2024.06.033

DO - 10.1016/j.jad.2024.06.033

M3 - Article

C2 - 38908554

AN - SCOPUS:85197374254

SN - 0165-0327

VL - 361

SP - 674

EP - 683

JO - Journal of Affective Disorders

JF - Journal of Affective Disorders

ER -

DEPRESsion Screening Data (DEPRESSD) Collaboration, Harel D, Wu Y, Levis B, Fan S, Sun Y et al. Comparison of Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and Hospital Anxiety and Depression – Depression subscale scores by administration mode: An individual participant data differential item functioning meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2024 Sept 15;361:674-683. Epub 2024 Jun 21. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.06.033

Comparison of Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and Hospital Anxiety and Depression – Depression subscale scores by administration mode: An individual participant data differential item functioning meta-analysis

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this