Comparison of two percutaneous radiological gastrostomy tubes in the nutritional management of ALS patients.

A Rio, M A Ampong, M R Turner, A S Shaw, A Al-Chalabi, C E Shaw, P N Leigh, P S Sidhu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Patient care and minimizing complications post gastrostomy have to date received little attention in ALS patients. We compare the complications associated with pigtail and mushroom type percutaneous radiological gastrostomy tubes in this patient group. Patients requiring PRG received either Wills-Oglesby(TM) or the skin level Entristar(TM). Retrospective review of the clinical notes was performed capturing demographic data, peristomal infection, tube displacement, tube failure, nutritional status, site of disease onset, and survival. Thirty-five patients ( Group 1) had the Wills-Oglesby(TM) tube of which 14 (40%) tubes required replacement. The Entristar(TM) tube was inserted in 29 patients ( Group 2) where 8 (28%) required replacement (NS). The incidence of infection was significantly lower with the Entristar(TM) tube, ( p
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)177 - 181
Number of pages5
JournalAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Other Motor Neuron Disorders
Volume6
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2005

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of two percutaneous radiological gastrostomy tubes in the nutritional management of ALS patients.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this