Complexity in Language Acquisition

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)


Learning theory has frequently been applied to language acquisition, but discussion has largely focused on information theoretic problems—in particular on the absence of direct negative evi- dence. Such arguments typically neglect the probabilistic nature of cognition and learning in gen- eral. We argue first that these arguments, and analyses based on them suffer from a major flaw: they systematically conflate the hypothesis class and the learnable concept class. As a result, they do not allow one to draw significant conclusions about the learner. Second, we claim that the real problem for language learning is the computational complexity of constructing a hypothesis from input data. Studying this problem allows for a more direct approach to the object of study—the language acquisition device—rather than the learnable class of languages, which is epiphenomenal and possibly hard to characterize. The learnability results informed by complexity studies are much more insightful. They strongly suggest that target grammars need to be objective, in the sense that the primitive elements of these grammars are based on objectively definable properties of the language itself. These considerations support the view that language acquisition proceeds primarily through data-driven learning of some form.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)89-110
Number of pages22
JournalTopics in Cognitive Science
Issue number1
Early online date17 Jan 2013
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2013


  • complexity, language acquiition


Dive into the research topics of 'Complexity in Language Acquisition'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this