Abstract
Recent work has explored the use of computational argumentation-based dialogues as a mechanism to support two-party human-robot interaction and collaborative decision making. Many real-world application scenarios involve interaction between multiple humans and multiple robots—not just two parties, i.e., not just one human and one robot. In this paper, a range of social issues are considered that arise in multiparty human-robot situations. These include issues of trust, privacy and ethics with respect to sharing information and modeling the beliefs of others. Using computational argumentation and argumentation-based dialogues can provide a sound basis for addressing the mitigating circumstances presented by these issues, and for reasoning under the uncertainties that these issues present. Here, a running example is developed,
along with an approach for addressing the issues that is based on the application of computational argumentation strategies.
A set of challenges are identified, and some directions for future
research are proposed.
along with an approach for addressing the issues that is based on the application of computational argumentation strategies.
A set of challenges are identified, and some directions for future
research are proposed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Proceedings of the Groups in Human-Robot Interaction Workshop |
| Subtitle of host publication | A workshop at the IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Publication status | Published - 2016 |