King's College London

Research portal

Conscious propositional attitudes and moral responsibility

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)585-597
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Moral Philosophy
Volume11
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Sep 2014

King's Authors

Abstract

By drawing on empirical evidence, Matt King and Peter Carruthers (2012) have recently argued that there are no conscious propositional attitudes, such as decisions, and that this undermines moral responsibility. Neil Levy (2012, forthcoming) responds to King and Carruthers, and claims that their considerations needn't worry theorists of moral responsibility. I argue that Levy's response to King and Carruthers' challenge to moral responsibility is unsatisfactory. After that, I propose what I take to be a preferable way of dealing with their challenge. I offer an account of moral responsibility that ties responsibility to consciously deciding to do X, as opposed to a conscious decision to do X. On this account, even if there are no conscious decisions, moral responsibility won't be undermined.

View graph of relations

© 2018 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454