CONTEST as Strategy: Reassessing Britain’s Counterterrorism Approach

TY - JOUR

T1 - CONTEST as Strategy

T2 - Reassessing Britain’s Counterterrorism Approach

AU - Gearson, John

AU - Rosemont, Hugo

PY - 2015/12/2

Y1 - 2015/12/2

N2 - The appropriateness of the United Kingdom’s counterterrorism strategy, known as CONTEST, divides opinion. This article reassesses CONTEST as strategy rather than simply examining its effectiveness as policy, or critiquing its individual parts. Reviewing the development of CONTEST in the context of wider analytical discussions on what makes for good strategy, the authors argue that several important strands of CONTEST are either underdeveloped or not yet as “strategic” as some analysts and the U.K. government itself have professed them to be. Fresh thinking on aspects of counterterrorism is urgently needed to counter the challenge of contemporary and future terrorism.

AB - The appropriateness of the United Kingdom’s counterterrorism strategy, known as CONTEST, divides opinion. This article reassesses CONTEST as strategy rather than simply examining its effectiveness as policy, or critiquing its individual parts. Reviewing the development of CONTEST in the context of wider analytical discussions on what makes for good strategy, the authors argue that several important strands of CONTEST are either underdeveloped or not yet as “strategic” as some analysts and the U.K. government itself have professed them to be. Fresh thinking on aspects of counterterrorism is urgently needed to counter the challenge of contemporary and future terrorism.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947492051&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/1057610X.2015.1099991

DO - 10.1080/1057610X.2015.1099991

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84947492051

SN - 1057-610X

VL - 38

SP - 1038

EP - 1064

JO - STUDIES IN CONFLICT AND TERRORISM

JF - STUDIES IN CONFLICT AND TERRORISM

IS - 12

ER -