Contradictions of austerity

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialpeer-review

66 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The global economic and financial crisis has been marked by the following paradox. A much more severe depression than the global slump of 2008-09 was prevented by determined state intervention in the form of bank bailouts and fiscal stimuli. Yet this bout of apparently successful Keynesianism has been followed by a turn to fiscal austerity justified in terms reminiscent of the Treasury View against which Keynes relentlessly polemicised in the 1930s. This article explores the sources of this policy shift. Among the factors considered are the ideology of neoliberalism, the economic and political power of the banks, and the relative weight of finance in individual economies. The broader context of financialisation is also considered. The conclusion is reached that an oscillation between bouts of austerity and laxer policies encouraging the development of asset bubbles may be built into neoliberalism as an economic policy regime. The implication is that alternatives to austerity must embrace broad institutional transformation.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberN/A
Pages (from-to)65 - 77
Number of pages13
JournalCAMBRIDGE JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS
Volume36
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2012

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Contradictions of austerity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this