Contrasting requirements during disease evolution identify EZH2 as a therapeutic target in AML

Faisal Basheer, George Giotopoulos, Eshwar Meduri, Haiyang Yun, Milena Mazan, Daniel Sasca, Paolo Gallipoli, Ludovica Marando, Malgorzata Gozdecka, Ryan Asby, Olivia Sheppard, Monika Dudek, Lars Bullinger, Hartmut Döhner, Richard Dillon, Sylvie Freeman, Oliver Ottmann, Alan Burnett, Nigel Russell, Elli PapaemmanuilRobert Hills, Peter Campbell, George S. Vassiliou, Brian J.P. Huntly*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

84 Citations (Scopus)
133 Downloads (Pure)


Epigenetic regulators, such as EZH2, are frequently mutated in cancer, and loss-of-function EZH2 mutations are common in myeloid malignancies. We have examined the importance of cellular context for Ezh2 loss during the evolution of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), where we observed stage-specific and diametrically opposite functions for Ezh2 at the early and late stages of disease. During disease maintenance, WT Ezh2 exerts an oncogenic function that may be therapeutically targeted. In contrast, Ezh2 acts as a tumor suppressor during AML induction. Transcriptional analysis explains this apparent paradox, demonstrating that loss of Ezh2 derepresses different expression programs during disease induction and maintenance. During disease induction, Ezh2 loss derepresses a subset of bivalent promoters that resolve toward gene activation, inducing a feto-oncogenic program that includes genes such as Plag1, whose overexpression phenocopies Ezh2 loss to accelerate AML induction in mouse models. Our data highlight the importance of cellular context and disease phase for the function of Ezh2 and its potential therapeutic implications.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)966-981
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Experimental Medicine
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2019


Dive into the research topics of 'Contrasting requirements during disease evolution identify EZH2 as a therapeutic target in AML'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this