Convergence More or Less: Why Do Practices Vary as they Diffuse?

Robyn Klingler-Vidra, Philip Schleifer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

45 Citations (Scopus)
274 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Much of the diffusion literature in international relations, international political economy, and comparative public policy focuses on explaining patterns of convergence among states, international organizations, and transnational organizations. This literature suggests that full or complete convergence is not a necessary or even likely outcome of diffusion processes. However, as of yet, findings of varying degrees of convergence remain largely context-specific and a more general and systematic review of the mechanisms explaining “how much” convergence occurs is still missing. To address this gap, this article offers a state-of-the-art review of studies describing and explaining the phenomenon. On that basis, we trace the occurrence of varying degrees of convergence back to differences in (i) the nature of the underlying diffusion model; (ii) the specificity of the diffusion item; (iii) the type of diffusion mechanism in operation; and (iv) the institutional context at the point of adoption.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)264-274
Number of pages11
JournalInternational Studies Review
Volume16
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2014

Keywords

  • diffusion, convergence, international political economy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Convergence More or Less: Why Do Practices Vary as they Diffuse?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this