King's College London

Research portal

Convergent Variation and the Production of Piers Plowman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)137-73
JournalThe Yearbook of Langland Studies
Accepted/In press30 Mar 2020
Published31 Dec 2020

King's Authors


This essay re-demonstrates the pervasive reality of convergent variation, whereby unrelated manuscripts (here, of Piers Plowman A and B) come upon the same unauthorial reading. It does so by testing the data and methodology of Michael Madrinkian’s revolutionary proposal about the production of Piers Plowman B (YLS 32), which argues that the B-reviser’s A manuscript was quite corrupt and that, in a separate set of episodes, many of its readings contaminated the main A-text families. He presents his conclusions as having extraordinary implications that are damning for Kane-Donaldson’s edition. Yet Madrinkian mischaracterizes or misunderstands both the nature of the (A)B agreements and the workings of convergent variation, especially coincident substitution. Nothing that he presents as evidence leads easily to his conclusions, and substantial evidence points away from them.

View graph of relations

© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454