Abstract
Within the abstract, the following phrase in the ‘Methods’ section “According to FED trajectory, patients were classified as (i) dose (FED increase by ≥ 50% or newly initiated);” was corrected to read “According to FED trajectory, patients were classifed as (i) dose ↑ (FED increase by ≥ 50% or newly initiated);”. In the ‘Results’ section of the abstract, the sentence“Baseline FED was independently associated with outcome (HR per 20 mg increase: 1.12 [95% CI 1.04–1.22, p = 0.003].” was corrected to “Baseline FED was independently associated with outcome (HR per 20 mg increase: 1.12 [95% CI 1.04–1.22], p = 0.003).” Finally, in Table 1, the LVEF, % for Dose↓ patients was given incorrectly when it should have been “28 (22–34)” and the N value has been corrected from “263” to “282”. The original article has been corrected.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 454 |
| Number of pages | 1 |
| Journal | Clinical Research in Cardiology |
| Volume | 112 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - 6 Dec 2022 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Correction: Diuretic dose trajectories in dilated cardiomyopathy: prognostic implications (Clinical Research in Cardiology, (2023), 112, 3, (419-430), 10.1007/s00392-022-02126-8)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver