Correction to: The use and impact of surveillance-based technology initiatives in inpatient and acute mental health settings: a systematic review (BMC Medicine, (2024), 22, 1, (564), 10.1186/s12916-024-03673-9)

TY - JOUR

T1 - Correction to

T2 - The use and impact of surveillance-based technology initiatives in inpatient and acute mental health settings: a systematic review (BMC Medicine, (2024), 22, 1, (564), 10.1186/s12916-024-03673-9)

AU - Griffiths, Jessica L.

AU - Saunders, Katherine R.K.

AU - Foye, Una

AU - Greenburgh, Anna

AU - Regan, Ciara

AU - Cooper, Ruth E.

AU - Powell, Rose

AU - Thomas, Ellen

AU - Brennan, Geoff

AU - Rojas-García, Antonio

AU - Lloyd-Evans, Brynmor

AU - Johnson, Sonia

AU - Simpson, Alan

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2025.

PY - 2025/12

Y1 - 2025/12

N2 - The authors wish to note an amendment to the following text in the original article: ‘[…] This may be an over-estimation because, while the only published study investigating VBPMM’s impact on self-harm reported a 44% relative reduction in self-harm rates in patients' bedrooms on two VBPMM wards compared to two control wards without VBPMM, the actual reduction in self-harm rates on the VBPMM wards alone was only 22% [1]. Additionally, these models calculated Accident and Emergency self-harm treatment costs using the weighted average of fracture codes, which risks over-estimating cost savings […]’ The authors wish to acknowledge the ‘Stop Oxevision’ campaign’s contribution in the context of this text, and to note that it should instead read as follows: ‘[…] The Stop Oxevision campaign [2] argues that this may be an over-estimation because, while the only published study investigating VBPMM’s impact on self-harm reported a 44% relative reduction in self-harm rates in patients’ bedrooms on two VBPMM wards compared to two control wards without VBPMM, the actual reduction in self-harm rates on the VBPMM wards alone was only 22% [1, 3].

AB - The authors wish to note an amendment to the following text in the original article: ‘[…] This may be an over-estimation because, while the only published study investigating VBPMM’s impact on self-harm reported a 44% relative reduction in self-harm rates in patients' bedrooms on two VBPMM wards compared to two control wards without VBPMM, the actual reduction in self-harm rates on the VBPMM wards alone was only 22% [1]. Additionally, these models calculated Accident and Emergency self-harm treatment costs using the weighted average of fracture codes, which risks over-estimating cost savings […]’ The authors wish to acknowledge the ‘Stop Oxevision’ campaign’s contribution in the context of this text, and to note that it should instead read as follows: ‘[…] The Stop Oxevision campaign [2] argues that this may be an over-estimation because, while the only published study investigating VBPMM’s impact on self-harm reported a 44% relative reduction in self-harm rates in patients’ bedrooms on two VBPMM wards compared to two control wards without VBPMM, the actual reduction in self-harm rates on the VBPMM wards alone was only 22% [1, 3].

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105000000553&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s12916-025-03979-2

DO - 10.1186/s12916-025-03979-2

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 40055676

AN - SCOPUS:105000000553

SN - 1741-7015

VL - 23

JO - BMC Medicine

JF - BMC Medicine

IS - 1

M1 - 141

ER -