Abstract
Judgment is sometimes distinguished as 'taking something to be true'. While this gloss is suggestive, Brentano argued that truth is not one of the fundamental concepts in a theory of judgment. Judgments in the sense of datable mental events are correct or incorrect. Truth is a derived notion that applies to the contents of judgments: a content is true if, and only if, judging it is correct. In this paper I will explain Brentano's 'correctness first' view and assess what it tells us about judgment as well as truth.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | The Act and Object of Judgment |
Subtitle of host publication | Historical and Philosophical Perspectives |
Publisher | Taylor and Francis Ltd. |
Pages | 129-150 |
Number of pages | 22 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9780429787621 |
ISBN (Print) | 9781138351387 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2019 |