King's College London

Research portal

Correlates of Hallucinatory Experiences in the General Population: An International Multisite Replication Study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Peter Moseley, André Aleman, Paul Allen, Vaughan Bell, Josef Bless, Catherine Bortolon, Matteo Cella, Jane Garrison, Kenneth Hugdahl, Eva Kozáková, Frank Larøi, Jamie Moffatt, Nicolas Say, David Smailes, Mimi Suzuki, Wei Lin Toh, Todd Woodward, Yuliya Zaytseva, Susan Rossell, Charles Fernyhough

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1024-1037
Number of pages14
JournalPsychological Science
Volume32
Issue number7
Early online date4 Jun 2021
DOIs
Accepted/In press11 Jul 2020
E-pub ahead of print4 Jun 2021
PublishedJul 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information: We thank Stephen Moss, Marie Polaskova, Aderinsola Adebowale, and Candela Donantueno for assisting with data collection and Ben Alderson-Day for help in conceptualizing the study. Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2021. Copyright: Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

King's Authors

Abstract

Hallucinatory experiences can occur in both clinical and nonclinical groups. However, in previous studies of the general population, investigations of the cognitive mechanisms underlying hallucinatory experiences have yielded inconsistent results. We ran a large-scale preregistered multisite study, in which general-population participants (N = 1,394 across 11 data-collection sites and online) completed assessments of hallucinatory experiences, a measure of adverse childhood experiences, and four tasks: source memory, dichotic listening, backward digit span, and auditory signal detection. We found that hallucinatory experiences were associated with a higher false-alarm rate on the signal detection task and a greater number of reported adverse childhood experiences but not with any of the other cognitive measures employed. These findings are an important step in improving reproducibility in hallucinations research and suggest that the replicability of some findings regarding cognition in clinical samples needs to be investigated.

View graph of relations

© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454