COVID-19 vaccination acceptability in the UK at the start of the vaccination programme: a nationally representative cross-sectional survey (CoVAccS – wave 2)

Susan M Sherman; Julius Sim; Megan Cutts; Hannah Katharina Dasch; Richard Amlot; James Rubin; Nick Sevdalis; Louise Smith

doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2021.10.008

COVID-19 vaccination acceptability in the UK at the start of the vaccination programme: a nationally representative cross-sectional survey (CoVAccS – wave 2)

Susan M Sherman^*, Julius Sim, Megan Cutts, Hannah Katharina Dasch, Richard Amlot, James Rubin, Nick Sevdalis, Louise Smith

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

29 Citations (Scopus)

53 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objectives

Investigate factors associated with the intention to have the COVID-19 vaccination following initiation of the UK national vaccination programme.

Study design

An online cross-sectional survey completed by 1500 adults (13th–15th January 2021).

Methods

Linear regression analyses were used to investigate associations between intention to be vaccinated for COVID-19 and sociodemographic factors, previous influenza vaccination, attitudes and beliefs about COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccination and vaccination in general. Participants’ main reasons for likely vaccination (non-)uptake were also solicited.

Results

73.5% of participants (95% CI 71.2%, 75.7%) reported being likely to be vaccinated against COVID-19, 17.3% (95% CI 15.4%, 19.3%) were unsure, and 9.3% (95% CI 7.9%, 10.8%) reported being unlikely to be vaccinated. The full regression model explained 69.8% of the variance in intention. Intention was associated with: having been/intending to be vaccinated for influenza last winter/this winter; stronger beliefs about social acceptability of a COVID-19 vaccine; the perceived need for vaccination; adequacy of information about the vaccine; and weaker beliefs that the vaccine is unsafe. Beliefs that only those at serious risk of illness should be vaccinated and that the vaccines are just a means for manufacturers to make money were negatively associated with vaccination intention.

Conclusions

Most participants reported being likely to get the COVID-19 vaccination. COVID-19 vaccination attitudes and beliefs are a crucial factor underpinning vaccine intention. Continued engagement with the public with a focus on the importance and safety of vaccination is recommended.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1-9
Number of pages	9
Journal	Public Health
Volume	202
Early online date	18 Oct 2021
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2021.10.008
Publication status	Published - Jan 2022

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1016/j.puhe.2021.10.008

COVID-19 vaccination acceptability_SHERMAN_Publishedonline18October2021_GREEN AAM (CC BY-NC-ND)Accepted author manuscript, 487 KBLicence: CC BY-NC-ND

Cite this

@article{898d59c08a3b4114a469f7775aec300e,

title = "COVID-19 vaccination acceptability in the UK at the start of the vaccination programme: a nationally representative cross-sectional survey (CoVAccS – wave 2)",

abstract = "ObjectivesInvestigate factors associated with the intention to have the COVID-19 vaccination following initiation of the UK national vaccination programme.Study designAn online cross-sectional survey completed by 1500 adults (13th–15th January 2021).MethodsLinear regression analyses were used to investigate associations between intention to be vaccinated for COVID-19 and sociodemographic factors, previous influenza vaccination, attitudes and beliefs about COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccination and vaccination in general. Participants{\textquoteright} main reasons for likely vaccination (non-)uptake were also solicited.Results73.5% of participants (95% CI 71.2%, 75.7%) reported being likely to be vaccinated against COVID-19, 17.3% (95% CI 15.4%, 19.3%) were unsure, and 9.3% (95% CI 7.9%, 10.8%) reported being unlikely to be vaccinated. The full regression model explained 69.8% of the variance in intention. Intention was associated with: having been/intending to be vaccinated for influenza last winter/this winter; stronger beliefs about social acceptability of a COVID-19 vaccine; the perceived need for vaccination; adequacy of information about the vaccine; and weaker beliefs that the vaccine is unsafe. Beliefs that only those at serious risk of illness should be vaccinated and that the vaccines are just a means for manufacturers to make money were negatively associated with vaccination intention.ConclusionsMost participants reported being likely to get the COVID-19 vaccination. COVID-19 vaccination attitudes and beliefs are a crucial factor underpinning vaccine intention. Continued engagement with the public with a focus on the importance and safety of vaccination is recommended.",

author = "Sherman, {Susan M} and Julius Sim and Megan Cutts and Dasch, {Hannah Katharina} and Richard Amlot and James Rubin and Nick Sevdalis and Louise Smith",

note = "Funding Information: The authors disclose receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: a Keele University Faculty of Natural Sciences Research Development award to SS, JS and NS, and a Kings COVID Appeal Fund award granted jointly to LS, GJR, RA, NS, SS and JS. LS, RA and GJR are supported by the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Emergency Preparedness and Response, a partnership between Public Health England , King's College London and the University of East Anglia . NS′ research is supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration ( ARC ) South London at King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. NS is a member of King's Improvement Science, which offers co-funding to the NIHR ARC South London and is funded by King's Health Partners ( Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust , King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust , King's College London and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust ), and the Guy's and St Thomas{\textquoteright} Charity. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR, the charities, Public Health England or the Department of Health and Social Care. Funding Information: The authors disclose receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: a Keele University Faculty of Natural Sciences Research Development award to SS, JS and NS, and a Kings COVID Appeal Fund award granted jointly to LS, GJR, RA, NS, SS and JS. LS, RA and GJR are supported by the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Emergency Preparedness and Response, a partnership between Public Health England, King's College London and the University of East Anglia. NS? research is supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) South London at King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. NS is a member of King's Improvement Science, which offers co-funding to the NIHR ARC South London and is funded by King's Health Partners (Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, King's College London and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust), and the Guy's and St Thomas? Charity. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR, the charities, Public Health England or the Department of Health and Social Care. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 The Royal Society for Public Health",

year = "2022",

month = jan,

doi = "10.1016/j.puhe.2021.10.008",

language = "English",

volume = "202",

pages = "1--9",

journal = "Public Health",

issn = "0033-3506",

publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - COVID-19 vaccination acceptability in the UK at the start of the vaccination programme: a nationally representative cross-sectional survey (CoVAccS – wave 2)

AU - Sherman, Susan M

AU - Sim, Julius

AU - Cutts, Megan

AU - Dasch, Hannah Katharina

AU - Amlot, Richard

AU - Rubin, James

AU - Sevdalis, Nick

AU - Smith, Louise

N1 - Funding Information: The authors disclose receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: a Keele University Faculty of Natural Sciences Research Development award to SS, JS and NS, and a Kings COVID Appeal Fund award granted jointly to LS, GJR, RA, NS, SS and JS. LS, RA and GJR are supported by the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Emergency Preparedness and Response, a partnership between Public Health England , King's College London and the University of East Anglia . NS′ research is supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration ( ARC ) South London at King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. NS is a member of King's Improvement Science, which offers co-funding to the NIHR ARC South London and is funded by King's Health Partners ( Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust , King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust , King's College London and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust ), and the Guy's and St Thomas’ Charity. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR, the charities, Public Health England or the Department of Health and Social Care. Funding Information: The authors disclose receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: a Keele University Faculty of Natural Sciences Research Development award to SS, JS and NS, and a Kings COVID Appeal Fund award granted jointly to LS, GJR, RA, NS, SS and JS. LS, RA and GJR are supported by the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Emergency Preparedness and Response, a partnership between Public Health England, King's College London and the University of East Anglia. NS? research is supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) South London at King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. NS is a member of King's Improvement Science, which offers co-funding to the NIHR ARC South London and is funded by King's Health Partners (Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, King's College London and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust), and the Guy's and St Thomas? Charity. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR, the charities, Public Health England or the Department of Health and Social Care. Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Royal Society for Public Health

PY - 2022/1

Y1 - 2022/1

N2 - ObjectivesInvestigate factors associated with the intention to have the COVID-19 vaccination following initiation of the UK national vaccination programme.Study designAn online cross-sectional survey completed by 1500 adults (13th–15th January 2021).MethodsLinear regression analyses were used to investigate associations between intention to be vaccinated for COVID-19 and sociodemographic factors, previous influenza vaccination, attitudes and beliefs about COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccination and vaccination in general. Participants’ main reasons for likely vaccination (non-)uptake were also solicited.Results73.5% of participants (95% CI 71.2%, 75.7%) reported being likely to be vaccinated against COVID-19, 17.3% (95% CI 15.4%, 19.3%) were unsure, and 9.3% (95% CI 7.9%, 10.8%) reported being unlikely to be vaccinated. The full regression model explained 69.8% of the variance in intention. Intention was associated with: having been/intending to be vaccinated for influenza last winter/this winter; stronger beliefs about social acceptability of a COVID-19 vaccine; the perceived need for vaccination; adequacy of information about the vaccine; and weaker beliefs that the vaccine is unsafe. Beliefs that only those at serious risk of illness should be vaccinated and that the vaccines are just a means for manufacturers to make money were negatively associated with vaccination intention.ConclusionsMost participants reported being likely to get the COVID-19 vaccination. COVID-19 vaccination attitudes and beliefs are a crucial factor underpinning vaccine intention. Continued engagement with the public with a focus on the importance and safety of vaccination is recommended.

AB - ObjectivesInvestigate factors associated with the intention to have the COVID-19 vaccination following initiation of the UK national vaccination programme.Study designAn online cross-sectional survey completed by 1500 adults (13th–15th January 2021).MethodsLinear regression analyses were used to investigate associations between intention to be vaccinated for COVID-19 and sociodemographic factors, previous influenza vaccination, attitudes and beliefs about COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccination and vaccination in general. Participants’ main reasons for likely vaccination (non-)uptake were also solicited.Results73.5% of participants (95% CI 71.2%, 75.7%) reported being likely to be vaccinated against COVID-19, 17.3% (95% CI 15.4%, 19.3%) were unsure, and 9.3% (95% CI 7.9%, 10.8%) reported being unlikely to be vaccinated. The full regression model explained 69.8% of the variance in intention. Intention was associated with: having been/intending to be vaccinated for influenza last winter/this winter; stronger beliefs about social acceptability of a COVID-19 vaccine; the perceived need for vaccination; adequacy of information about the vaccine; and weaker beliefs that the vaccine is unsafe. Beliefs that only those at serious risk of illness should be vaccinated and that the vaccines are just a means for manufacturers to make money were negatively associated with vaccination intention.ConclusionsMost participants reported being likely to get the COVID-19 vaccination. COVID-19 vaccination attitudes and beliefs are a crucial factor underpinning vaccine intention. Continued engagement with the public with a focus on the importance and safety of vaccination is recommended.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85119493002&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.10.008

DO - 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.10.008

M3 - Article

SN - 0033-3506

VL - 202

SP - 1

EP - 9

JO - Public Health

JF - Public Health

ER -

COVID-19 vaccination acceptability in the UK at the start of the vaccination programme: a nationally representative cross-sectional survey (CoVAccS – wave 2)

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this