Cross-examining dissociative identity disorder: Neuroimaging and etiology on trial

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    15 Citations (Scopus)


    Dissociative identity disorder (DID) is probably the most disputed of psychiatric diagnoses and of psychological forensic evaluations in the legal arena. The iatrogenic proponents assert that DID phenomena originate from psychotherapeutic treatment while traumagenic proponents state that DID develops after severe and chronic childhood trauma. In addition, DID that is simulated with malingering intentions, but not stimulated by psychotherapeutic treatment, may be called pseudogenic. With DID gaining more interest among the general public it can be expected that the number of pseudogenic cases will grow and the need to distinguish between traumagenic, iatrogenic or pseudogenic DID will increase accordingly. This paper discusses whether brain imaging studies can inform the judiciary and/or distinguish the etiology of DID
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)44 - 53
    Number of pages10
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - Feb 2008


    Dive into the research topics of 'Cross-examining dissociative identity disorder: Neuroimaging and etiology on trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this