Abstract
BACKGROUND: Simulation based training enables pediatric surgical trainees to attain proficiency in surgical skills. This study aims to identify the currently available simulators for pediatric surgery, assess their validation and strength of evidence supporting each model.
METHODS: Both Medline and EMBASE were searched for English language articles either describing or validating simulation models for pediatric surgery. A level of evidence (LoE) followed by a level of recommendation (LoR) was assigned to each validation study and simulator, based on a modified Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine classification for educational studies.
RESULTS: Forty-nine articles were identified describing 44 training models and courses. Of these articles, 44 were validation studies. Face validity was evaluated by 20 studies, 28 for content, 24 demonstrated construct validity and 1 showed predictive validity. Of the validated models, 3 were given an LoR of 2, 21 an LoR of 3 and 12 an LoR of 4. None reached the highest LoR.
CONCLUSIONS: There are a growing number of simulators specific to pediatric surgery. However, these simulators have limited LoE and LoR in current studies. The lack of NoTSS training is also apparent. We advocate more randomized trials to validate these models, and attempts to determine predictive validity.
TYPE OF STUDY: Original / systematic review.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1884-1893 |
| Journal | Journal of Pediatric Surgery |
| Volume | 54 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| Early online date | 8 Dec 2018 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2019 |
Keywords
- Education
- Paediatric surgery
- Pediatric surgery
- Simulation
- Training